Answer:
19.82%
Explanation:
Midpoint method = Q2 - Q1 / [(Q2 + Q1) / 2] / P2 - P1 / [(P2+P1) / 2]
3.33 = 2000 - 1000 / [(2000 + 1000) / 2] / P2 - P1 / [(P2+P1)/2]
3.33 = 0.66 / (P2 - P1) / [(P2+P1)/2]
By cross multiplying we have
0.66 = 3.33 [ (P2 - P1) / [(P2+P1)/2]
divide both sides by 3.33
19.82% = The mid point change in price.
E.) Opportunity cost is the cost associated with giving up one opportunity for the benefit earned by another.
Answer:
hii can we be friends
अनुपात के लिए प्रतिशत कैसे प्राप्त करें
अनुपात अक्सर एम: एन या एम / एन के रूप में व्यक्त किए जाते हैं। अनुपात को प्रतिशत के रूप में परिवर्तित करने के लिए, केवल m को n से विभाजित करें और फिर परिणाम को 100 से गुणा करें।
अनुपात को प्रतिशत में बदलने के लिए कदम
रूपांतरण में तीन सरल चरण होते हैं:
चरण 1: पहली संख्या को दूसरी संख्या से विभाजित करें
चरण 2: प्रतिशत में बदलने के लिए 100 से गुणा करें
चरण 3: प्रतिशत प्रतीक जोड़ें (%)
उदाहरण के लिए , यदि अनुपात 12: 4 है, तो इसे प्रपत्र 12/4 में बदल दें, जो एक समीकरण है जिसे हम हल कर सकते हैं। उसके बाद, प्रतिशत प्राप्त करने के लिए परिणाम को 100 से गुणा करें।
<h2>12 3 4 = 3 </h2>
<h2>3 × 100 = 300%</h2>
अनुपात के लिए प्रतिशत को हल करने के लिए समीकरण
Answer:
Cost of hedging = $24,000
Explanation:
cost of hedging = 1,200,000 * ($0.80 - $0.82) = 1,200,000 * $0.02 = -$24,000
Since the actual forward rate was higher than th eexpected forward rte, the coampny lost money by hedging the operation. The cost of hedging the operation was $24,000.
Answer: d. Make bribery of foreign officials a criminal offense but not consider facilitating payments a criminal offense.
Explanation:
In December 1997, signatories accounting for around 70% of World Trade adopted the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions which stated that countries must install Legislative laws that would prohibit the bribing of foreign officials as well as strict penalties for parties who engage in such. This was done to ensure that the playing field was level so to speak instead of one company getting special treatment because they paid for it.
One concern however was that the Convention did not consider Facilitating Payments a criminal offence which means that it could be used as a bypass for the bribery of foreign officials to still happen.
