<span>Since the business owner, by definition, is the person who controls all those assets and is responsible for them, he/she can take parts of them home if they so choose. This is a way to manage resources, especially if those resources are still useful in some way.</span>
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
The best answer choice would be "B". This gives the main idea of what your debate would be about. It is also clear, and not biased or opinionated.
I hope this helps!
~cupcake
There will be an increase in quantity supplied. (The Law of Supply)
- A key tenet of economic theory is the rule of supply, which asserts that a rise in price will result in an increase in the quantity provided, all other things being equal. In other words, there is a direct correlation between price and quantity, and quantities react to price changes in the same way.'
<h3><u>What is a case of the law of supply?</u></h3>
- For instance, if Apple produces 100 iPhones, then this is the quantity that is sold. The link between pricing and supply is referred to as the "law of supply." Supply also rises in tandem with price growth. In the event that prices decline, so will supply.
To Learn more about Law of Supply, Click the links.
brainly.com/question/17805586
brainly.com/question/17805586
#SPJ4
Answer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65c4d/65c4d2f52b12b811996178e9915af57902072942" alt="P(E1)=\frac{20}{50}=0.4"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daeec/daeeca70cfe78a896e6a3ea5d9301cae81ba2aa3" alt="P(E2)=\frac{13}{50}=0.26"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c4a9/2c4a9e5e48f9f62cd5ca676446cf064a8c5ef429" alt="P(E3)=\frac{13}{50}=0.34"
I used the relative frequency method
Explanation:
To solve this question we can use the relative frequency to find out each probability. The relative frequency is the ratio of the occurrence of each event and the total number of outcomes.
Here the experiment has been repeated 50 times, so that is the total number of outcomes and the denominator. There are 3 possible events E1, E2, and E3, so we can calculate the ratios to get the probabilities
Event E1 occurred 20 times of the 50: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f86f9/f86f969083de09d7652d37a78b8feb500cedc24e" alt="P(E1)=\frac{20}{50}"
Event E2 occurred 13 times of the 50: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9097/e90979e843bc81e49754e5d0f3450eb993a8e6e2" alt="P(E2)=\frac{13}{50}"
Event E3 occurred 17 times of the 50: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec459/ec459c99588dd84f8a9a2a323cc20d621aaf5b79" alt="P(E3)=\frac{17}{50}"