Answer: it’s the last one “freedom does not come easy, does not fall naturally from the sky.
Explanation:
<span>Mixed market economies focus on preserving as much freedom to make economic choices as possible. Governments in these economies have limited involvement in managing and regulating the economy. In contrast, command economies are focused most on preserving and requiring equal opportunities, which means governments that greatly regulate the economy. More economic systems are geared toward offering producers and consumers the freedom to make economic choices, so mixed market economies are more common in the world today.</span>
Since you provide no options, That could be considered an economic Benefit. Using require materials will lead to using less money for the expenditure, which later on could be allocated to fund a more important/pressing matter such as welfare.
hope this helps
The best answer would be D.
The debate over whether a bill of rights should be added to the Constitution or not, started from some delegates' beliefs that guarantees of certain basic rights were missing from the ratified Constitution. They wanted some amendments to be included, in order to secure those liberties to the citizens.
The Federalists (those who supported the ratification of the Constitution) argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal gonvernmnet. Alexander Hamilton, for example, argued that because the proposed federal government would possess only specifically assigned limited powers, ir could not threaten the fundamental liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists, however, held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty and the power of the states.
