Answer:
Yes, Its a good idea but depends upon type of image. Like adding a logo to all the slides at top left corner is not just good but a must for all as well, when we are preparing official documents. However, other images when decided to be repeated must convey the correct intent in each page. If this is not the case, you need to avoid it. Intent is the most important aspect certainly. For rest see explanation.
Explanation:
Yes, and as mentioned above adding logo and other images meaningfully, and with correct intent is a good idea.
However, images must not be blurred, tiny or stretched. Also proper cropping is a must. The border should be solid as well. And when selecting a lot of images, the images must convey the correct meaning together. Moreover, the aspect ratio after stretching must be same as the original. You can do this in PowerPoint by going to format > crop > fill.
Ensure that watermarks are not revealed. Buy them rather than copy from somewhere for better outcome. And never amputate your readers with a headache creating backgrounds. You will loose readers then. The clip arts must be used in right number, and not a lot of them certainly.
Ensure both text and images are in correct ratios. Avoid using more than 2 images per slide.
A system of interconnected computers that share a central storage system and various peripheral devices such as a printers, scanners, or routers. Each computer connected to the system can operate independently, but has the ability to communicate with other external devices and computers
<span>Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/computer-system.html</span>
The types of software that you'd want to have an explicit application policy are:
- Filesharing software
- video games
- Explicit application policy are simply refered to as legal rights that are stated regarding ownership or company. It is actual substance of an agreement
- Video games and filesharing software is of not really important in som business. So therefore, having explicit policies showing why or not this type of software is permitted on systems is okay.
Conclusively, we can say that Filesharing software and video games can require an explicit application policy.
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/12730075
A sixteen bit microprocessor chip used in early IBM PCs. The Intel 8088 was a version with an eight-bit externaldata bus.
The Intel 8086 was based on the design of the Intel 8080 <span>and </span>Intel 8085 (it was source compatible with the 8080)with a similar register set, but was expanded to 16 bits. The Bus Interface Unit fed the instruction stream to theExecution Unit through a 6 byte prefetch queue, so fetch and execution were concurrent - a primitive form ofpipelining (8086 instructions varied from 1 to 4 bytes).
It featured four 16-bit general registers, which could also be accessed as eight 8-bit registers, and four 16-bit indexregisters (including the stack pointer). The data registers were often used implicitly by instructions, complicatingregister allocation for temporary values. It featured 64K 8-bit I/O (or 32K 16 bit) ports and fixed vectored interrupts.There were also four segment registers that could be set from index registers.
The segment registers allowed the CPU to access 1 meg of memory in an odd way. Rather than just supplyingmissing bytes, as most segmented processors, the 8086 actually shifted the segment registers left 4 bits and addedit to the address. As a result, segments overlapped, and it was possible to have two pointers with the same valuepoint to two different memory locations, or two pointers with different values pointing to the same location. Mostpeople consider this a brain damaged design.
Although this was largely acceptable for assembly language, where control of the segments was complete (it couldeven be useful then), in higher level languages it caused constant confusion (e.g. near/far pointers). Even worse, thismade expanding the address space to more than 1 meg difficult. A later version, the Intel 80386, expanded thedesign to 32 bits, and "fixed" the segmentation, but required extra modes (suppressing the new features) forcompatibility, and retains the awkward architecture. In fact, with the right assembler, code written for the 8008 canstill be run on the most <span>recent </span>Intel 486.
The Intel 80386 added new op codes in a kludgy fashion similar to the Zilog Z80 and Zilog Z280. The Intel 486added full pipelines, and clock doubling (like <span>the </span>Zilog Z280).
So why did IBM chose the 8086 series when most of the alternatives were so much better? Apparently IBM's own engineers wanted to use the Motorola 68000, and it was used later in the forgotten IBM Instruments 9000 Laboratory Computer, but IBM already had rights to manufacture the 8086, in exchange for giving Intel the rights to its bubble memory<span> designs.</span> Apparently IBM was using 8086s in the IBM Displaywriter word processor.
Other factors were the 8-bit Intel 8088 version, which could use existing Intel 8085-type components, and allowed the computer to be based on a modified 8085 design. 68000 components were not widely available, though it could useMotorola 6800 components to an <span>extent.
</span>
Hope this helps
Answer:
In a digital camera, exactly the opposite happens. Light from the thing you are photographing zooms into the camera lens. This incoming "picture" hits the image sensor chip, which breaks it up into millions of pixels. The sensor measures the color and brightness of each pixel and stores it as a number.
Explanation:
