Answer: object performance
Explanation:
The term "object permanence" is used to describe a child's ability to know that objects continue to exist even though they can no longer be seen or heard. It means her mother still exist even though she doesnt see her all the time.it requires the ability to form a mental representation
Your body begins the decomposition process.
Answer:
It was the most fertile part of Egypt.
Explanation:
- The Nile River is the most important and striking feature of Egypt, without it life would be almost impossible in this area.
- People have been fascinated since the early days by the fact that the Nile flows about 7,000 km through the desert, and at the same time delivers vast quantities of water necessary for life.
- Unlike the Euphrates and Tigris, the Nile is a very reliable river, which flooded its banks at a time when it is most suitable for agricultural activities - it floods in June and the water recedes during October.
- During this flood period, the Nile leaves behind a rich layer of fertile black soil at the right time for winter sowing of cereals. The Nile provided the Egyptians with a great opportunity for communication and transportation.
- The river flows northwards and ensures ease of navigation in this direction, while at the same time the main winds blow southwards, which provides ships with the possibility of counter-current navigation. It is no wonder, then, that the name of the gift of the Nile is added to ancient Egypt, as Herodotus mentioned it.
Answer:
The analogical dialogue adds to the real dialogue the imaginative, transcendent facet, loaded with symbolic and connotative elements, bringing us closer to the multi-semantic nature of the concepts. Analogy, as an imaginative and creative resource, adds liveliness, fantasy.
Explanation:
The knowledge and use of analog processes results in the improvement of the four areas of language proficiency for the following reasons. In the first place, they promote the objectification of thought since analogical elaboration requires reflection and this, in turn, allows the appropriation of knowledge and facilitates its communicability. In this way, the territory of mere solipsistic speculation is abandoned and becomes a true mechanism of representation and transformation, that is, it places the subject in a reality capable of being modified. Likewise, it evidences the argumentative capacity of the issuer and opens the capacity for dialogue between thought and individual, between individual and reality and between subjects.
When the analogy is established, the narrow gates of human experience are opened, they are resized, they are given depth by revealing non-apparent meanings thanks to the relationship between essentially different beings. It is necessary to emphasize this last benefit, the analogy manages to surprise because it reveals contents that in a first examination may not be perceivable, but that unquestionably conform to the message and when not perceived, impose themselves on the receiver, leaving it at the mercy of the purpose of the message itself, locating it in a territory where questioning, dialogue or criticism are unlikely.
