Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer:
This sentence means if you have the determination and motivation, which is stated as faith, you can do anything. Faith, motivation, and determination can help an individual complete the smallest or biggest thing.
Explanation:
Answer:
De-individuation
Explanation:
De-individuation is the concept of social psychology. It is generally called the loss of general awareness. in a group of people. This is also called the matter of resistance. Many of the social psychologists have studied the concepts if de-individuation but in a different manner.
But on the other hand, the social psychologist is based on the context of the social situation. The social psychologist focused on the internal process of the psychological well being. The sociology focused on the context of the economic, political and social factors.
