1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rina8888 [55]
4 years ago
14

In contrast to Rousseau's traditional Christian ethics, the Prussian _________sought to build morality on transcendent reason an

d thus came to the conclusion that his morality had to be erected on the basis of the categorical imperative.
History
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is <u><em>Immanuel Kant</em></u>

In contrast to Rousseau's traditional Christian ethics, the Prussian <u><em>Immanuel Kant</em></u> sought to build morality on transcendent reason and thus came to the conclusion that his morality had to be erected on the basis of the categorical imperative.

Explanation:

Kant's moral doctrine is independent of any religious sense. His morality excludes the notion of intention as an element of a pure soul, and duty is not an obligation to be followed by virtue of a superior being. For Kant, moral and ethics are based on human choice, because they are created under social rules. Kant believes that the reason (faculty of ideas) is that it preserves the principles that articulate intention and duty according to the subject's autonomy.

You might be interested in
Write two paragraphs describing the different points of view in the following scenarios:
solmaris [256]

Answer:No secession ball will mark the day. Nor, it appears, are any other commemorative events planned by Texas, which would rather boast of its time as an independent country. But 150 years ago today, shortly after 11 a.m. on Feb. 1, 1861, a state convention voted overwhelmingly to secede from the Union.

In Austin, on the second floor of the old Texas statehouse just south of the current Capitol building (near the present-day Alamo and Texas Rangers monuments), cheering delegates to the special convention approved a short document declaring that the federal government was becoming "a weapon with which to strike down the interests and prosperity of the people of Texas and her Sister slaveholding States." Texas, they stated, was henceforth a "separate Sovereign state ... absolved from all allegiance to the United States." (An even more explicit "declaration of causes" followed a day later; it's well worth a read.)

For one aging veteran in the hall, this was the blackest of days. Sam Houston, the 67-year-old governor of Texas (who had twice served as president of the Republic of Texas), had for years almost single-handedly kept secessionist sentiment in the state at bay, despite being a slaveholder himself. Nearly three decades earlier, Houston had fought for Texan independence from Mexico and guided the fledgling Republic into the Union. He did not want to lose his life's work. "Mark me, the day that produces a dissolution of this [Union] will be written in the blood of humanity," Houston, then a U.S. senator, told Congress in 1854 as he defied Southern predilections to vote against the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Of himself, he had said: "I wish no prouder epitaph to mark the board or slab that may lie on my tomb than this: 'He loved his country, he was a patriot; he was devoted to the Union.'"

As secessionist fever swept Texas, Houston was denounced as a "traitor-knave" for his Unionist views. Always, though, when the grand old man — who still hobbled from a wound sustained at San Jacinto in 1836 — took the stage, he had been able to quell his rivals. But as the year 1860 drew to a close, with Abraham Lincoln's election causing South Carolina to secede and other states to teeter on the brink, Houston, despite being governor, could no longer hold back the tide.

He tried. When secessionists began clamoring for a special legislative session in anticipation of secession, Houston stalled. Soon, however, a secession convention at the end of January 1861 appeared inevitable. Houston convened a special session of the Legislature just before the convention, hoping that he could somehow persuade lawmakers to rein in the proceedings.

It was not to be. The delegates — chosen in a hastily organized election in early January — convened in Austin on Jan. 28, 1861, and quickly penned a document that would sever Texas' ties to the federal government. Houston was invited to the roll call on Feb. 1. He sat "grim and motionless," writes his biographer M.K. Wisehart. One man called him a traitor to his face, though Houston's allies swiftly demanded (and received) an apology. The delegates approved the secession ordinance, 166-8.

The governor won a few concessions, however. He had said he would swallow secession if the people ratified it — so it was put to a vote on Feb. 23, 1861, and the people affirmed it, 44,317 to 13,020. Houston tried to argue that Texas voters had merely approved secession, rather than latching onto the Confederacy. This was technically true, but the governor, who preferred that Texas should return to its old status as an independent country, had lost his sway. In March, Texas became the last state to join the Confederacy in the "first wave," before hostilities broke out at Fort Sumter.

A defiant Houston would swear no oath to the Confederacy, and he was finished as governor. "Fellow citizens, in the name of your rights and liberties, which I believe have been trampled upon, I refuse to take this oath," he declared on March 16, 1861. "In the name of the nationality of Texas, I refuse to take this oath. …" Nor would he live to see the end of the war he tried so hard to avert; he died in 1863, a year after the Battle of Shiloh, in which his son, Sam Jr., a Confederate soldier, was wounded and held prisoner for months. Texas, in fact, would become the site of the last battle of the Civil War, in May 1865. It was also the last rebel state readmitted to the Union, on March 30, 1870, subject to several conditions.

There is another peculiar post-script to the secessionist drama of 1861.

Oddly enough, one Robert E. Lee was living in Texas at that time. Lee had been stationed in Texas on and off for several years, commanding the Second United States Cavalry in frontier skirmishes against Comanches and Mexicans. He didn't seem too fond of the frontier life; he wrote to his wife of living of a "desert of dullness."

8 0
3 years ago
The legal right to expatriation means that you have the right to
8090 [49]
The legal right to expatriation means that you have the right to live in a country that you aren't a citizen of. Since, an expatriate is someone who lives (either temporarily or permanently) in a country other than that of their citizenship.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the slave codes affect enslaved people?
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

• The slave codes kept enslaved people from enslavers.

Explanation:

These slave codes gave white masters near total control over the slave's lives. This permits owners to use corporal punishments such as whipping, branding, maiming, and torture.

3 0
2 years ago
Which of these was the BIGGEST disadvantage for settlers wanting to take advantage of the opportunities created by the Land Ordi
Musya8 [376]

Answer:

B) Land speculators were most able to purchase land in the affected areas.

Explanation:

In 1784-1785, the Continental Congress discussed and adopted the first land ordinance, a draft of which was prepared by Jefferson, although the final approval of the ordinance was carried out in his absence. Amendments were made that belittled the Jefferson project, its democratic orientation. Particularly unfavorable was the condition that land can be sold in 640 acre plots at a minimum price per acre of $1. The purchase of such a site was available only to planters or land speculators.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The artistic value of the Bayeux Tapestry lies mostly in
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
I would say A its woven images since they were well known for their art
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The major purpose of the passage of the north american free trade agreement was to:
    10·1 answer
  • The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Warsaw Pact were two important Cold War organizations. Describe their purp
    14·2 answers
  • Describe the major effects of the fall of Rome on both eastern and Western Europe
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! CORRECT ANSWER ONLY PLEASE!!!
    8·2 answers
  • The practice of shielding one or more sectors of a country's economy from foreign competition through the use of tariffs or quot
    9·1 answer
  • Why did some states demand that the U.S. Constitution include a Bill of
    6·1 answer
  • How did tariffs that Alexander Hamilton put in place strengthen the American economy? A.They ensured that people bought more Bri
    10·1 answer
  • Put these in sequence for these events?
    8·1 answer
  • How are the number of electors each state gets determined?
    14·1 answer
  • How does Back to the Future Il demonstrate the concept of historical contingency?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!