1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bogdanovich [222]
4 years ago
6

How can you conclude whether the events in this timeline occurred before or after the life of Jesus of nazareth

History
1 answer:
olasank [31]4 years ago
5 0
You will know and remember that because it will be before Christ and after death for when he died on the cross
You might be interested in
Which statement best completes the diagram related to the Supreme Court's procedures?
anastassius [24]
I would need the diagram to answer this but people on other resources state that B is the correct answer :)

Good Luck
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One characteristic that Sumerians believed their gods possessed was a need to _________.
DanielleElmas [232]
The correct answer is D to be worshiped and pleased.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the views and goals of the Federalists, and anti-federalists.
nordsb [41]

The differences between the Federalists and the Antifederalists are vast and at times complex. Federalists’ beliefs could be better described as nationalist. The Federalists were instrumental in 1787 in shaping the new US Constitution, which strengthened the national government at the expense, according to the Antifederalists, of the states and the people. The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the US Constitution, but they never organized efficiently across all thirteen states, and so had to fight the ratification at every state convention. Their great success was in forcing the first Congress under the new Constitution to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated.

View this infographic as a downloadable PDF.

<span>Sources consulted:
Berkin, Carol. “Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists.” The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History video.
Wood, Gordon S. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009.</span> Questions for Discussion

You are seeing this page because you are not currently logged into our website. If you would like to access this page and you are not logged in, please login or register for a gilderlehrman.org account, and then visit the link that brought you to this notice. Thanks!

Citation Guidelines for Online Resources

Related Site Content <span><span>Teaching Resource: The United States Constitution: Federalists v. Anti-Federalists</span><span>Essay: Ordinary Americans and the Constitution</span><span>Essay: The Antifederalists: The Other Founders of the American Constitutional Tradition?</span><span>Essay: The Righteous Revolution of Mercy Otis Warren</span><span>Essay: The US Banking System: Origin, Development, and Regulation</span><span>Multimedia: Alexander Hamilton</span><span>Multimedia: Alexander Hamilton, American</span><span>Interactive: Alexander Hamilton: The Man Who Made Modern America</span><span>Multimedia: American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson</span><span>Teaching Resource: Analyzing the Great Compromise, 1787</span></span> Metadata

This was extremely helpful with my constitutional principles.

<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When Reagan says "freedom is the victor" is that a fact an opinon or a judgment response? cite evidence from the speech to suppo
oee [108]

Answer:

The statment made by Reagan about <em>"freedom is the victor"</em> is the <em>fact of an opinion rather than a judgement response</em>. This was in response to the wall which separate both sides of germany. The exact evidence from the speech that support this was when President Reagan said:

<em>"As I looked out a moment ago from the Reichstag, that embodiment of German unity, I noticed words crudely spray-painted upon the wall, perhaps by a young Berliner, 'This wall will fall. Beliefs become reality."</em>

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
How does the 3/5 compromise contribute to sectionalism
matrenka [14]

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise is an example of sectionalism in American history. The Compromise demonstrates group (white land owners) looking down upon another group (black slaves) as through they are lesser. The Three-Fifths Compromise degrades a whole group of people categorizing them as less than human.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the economic impact of Italy's location and trade on Renaissance art and culture.
    15·2 answers
  • Explain why new African states like the Ashanti Kingdom (or Asante) arose in the 1700s as a result of the Atlantic slave trade
    11·1 answer
  • What finally led to U.S participation in World War I? A- requests for support from England and France B- the addition of Mexico
    13·1 answer
  • The cotton gin was introduced in 1793. What was the<br> effect of this invention in the US?
    7·1 answer
  • The civil rights movement contributed to
    5·2 answers
  • Write a paragraph on why the African Elephant was endangered. <br>FIRST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST &lt;3
    5·1 answer
  • When and where was the first production of the play Hamlet?
    11·1 answer
  • Republicans sought to extend the vote to all free, white men, while the Whigs wanted to preserve property requirements.
    8·1 answer
  • D-DAY was the most significant event in ending the war in Europe during WWII' How far do you agree with this statement?
    6·1 answer
  • How did Washington respond to the Whiskey Rebellion?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!