Mapp Vs Ohio issues refer to a judicial case that took place in 1961, in which the Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 in a case where evidence presented at a trial was illegally obtained and used against the defendant.
Miss Mapp was a woman who refused to admit the intrussion of three Cleveland police officers into her house in persuit to some evidence in connection with a recent bombing issue. Officers did’nt have any warrant signed by a judge when they arrived to her home.
During the case, attorney allegated the protection of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the US (current since 1791 as a part of the Bill of Rights) for the woman. This amendment forbids unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals and property and implies that the use of evidence obtained in violation of the amendment is unconstitutional
Answer:
They studied medication and zoology. Lewis asked Clark to come with him
Explanation:
So they could prepare to get ready
King used a financial metaphor to refer to the lack of compliance with the civil rights that the Declaration of Independence and the Reconstruction Amendments to the US Constitution (14th and 15th) included for all US citizens, without discrimination in terms of race.
King aimed to express that the US still owed, to its black citizens, the defaulted "promissory note" that Martin Luther King Jr. had mentioned and demanded in his remarkable "I have a Dream" speech, delivered in 1963. Instead of guaranteeing the promised rights of life, of freedom, and of the pursuit of happiness, black people had received a black check, one with no funds on it and were still waiting for the payment of such debt.
the answer you are looking for is d
