The correct answer is: Incremental Theory of Intelligence
In accordance with the Incremental Theory of Intelligence, intelligence is not predetermined and can be upgraded through an adequate amount of effort. The incremental theory centres more on behavioral aspects, such as effort and the problem solving strategies, and, also, in continuing working towards the way of the mastery of the task.
In other words, those who believe in the incremental theory of intelligence, think that their intelligence is fluid, changeable and malleable, and that it can be increased through work and effort. Student that agree with the Incremental Theory of Intelligence, see gratification coming from the process of learning and frequently see opportunities to get one step ahead; they do not place their attention in what the end results will say about them, but in what they can achieve from taking part in the process.
Incremental theorists when dealing with no-success, behave differently, they desire to conquer challenges, they began to review various ways in which they could address the task differently, and they augment their efforts, that is because they believe that effort, through increased learning and strategy development, will actually augment their intelligence.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
bacteria and archaea
Explanation:
The most closely related taxonomic groups are the bacteria and archaea.They are the only prokaryotes among the taxonomic groups that are listed.In addition,both of them contain flagella as a locomotive structure.
