Answer:
The answer is Albert Bandura.
Explanation:
The research work conducted by Albert Bandura in the 60s and 70s led him and his collegues to propose the observational learning theory that would also set the basis for the social cognitive perspective of learning. Observational learning challenged the main theory on learning that existed at the time, the operant conditioning theory. Observational learning suggested that there was more to the cognitive process of learning than respondent and operant processes alone.
Answer:
Conditioned stimulus
Explanation:
In the classical conditioned, these terms such as condition stimulus, UCS, CS, NS, etc are being used to modify the behavior of a person, animal, etc. The conditioned stimulus is neutral before as a conditioned stimulus. Ivan Pavlov was the first psychologist who has been used classical conditioning in which a person used CS, UCS, UCR, and CR.
Thus here in the above statement, the person eats a hamburger. Before used it, it was a neutral stimulus but after using it, it becomes a conditioned stimulus.
Ethnomethodologists explore <u>background </u>assumptions about how the world operates that underlie our behavior.
Ethnomethodology is the examination of how social order is produced in and through methods of social interplay. It commonly seeks to offer an alternative to mainstream sociological strategies. In its most radical form, it poses a project to the social sciences as an entire.
Ethnomethodology is the observation of how social order is produced in and thru strategies of social interplay. It normally seeks to offer an alternative to mainstream sociological methods. In its maximum radical form, it poses a project to the social sciences as an entire.
Phenomenology tackles constitutional problems epistemologically, through phenomenological psychology. Ethnomethodology tackles them sociologically, thru the ethnographic description of actors' reporting and accounting practices.
Learn more about Ethnomethodologists here brainly.com/question/14453990
#SPJ4
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
