Which statement best summarizes Zimbardo’s perspective on the average person’s ability for evil?
A. People will continue to do bad things if they know they can blame it on their social surroundings.
B. A person's capacity for good or evil can change based on their social environment.
C. Social experiments are necessary to determine humanity’s capacity for evil.
D. Evil actions are justified if a person is in a challenging social situation.
Answer:
B. A person's capacity for good or evil can change based on their social environment.
Explanation:
According to the Stanford prison experiment done by Philip Zimbardo, some participants were taken to a facility where they had to act as prisoners and guards.
The "prisoners" were humiliated and dehumanized by the "guards", even though the "guards" were reluctant at first, but as they began to maltreat the "prisoners", they became more comfortable with their acts and began to do more and more.
The experiment shows that a person's ability for evil is based on how their social environment is.
The participants collaborated to enrich a part of this discussion through: option C.
<h3>What is a
discussion?</h3>
In English literature, a discussion can be defined as a form of communication in which two or more members of a group share their ideas and opinions on a subject matter (topic), especially for the purpose of clarity, enlightenment and knowledge.
In this scenario, the participants collaborated to enrich a part of this discussion when Kendall asked a pertinent question about whether or not the group must get permission for the flash mob.'
Read more on discussion here: brainly.com/question/2290843
#SPJ1
I’m pretty sure it’s the 1st one
The answer is B. This is because you as an individual have done everything on your power to achieve something to then find out that it is impossible for you to conquer beyond yourself
