There are infinitely many ways to do this. One such way is to draw a very thin stretched out rectangle (say one that is very tall) and a square. Example: the rectangle is 100 by 2, while the square is 4 by 4.
Both the rectangle and the square have the same corresponding angle measures. All angles are 90 degrees.
However, the figures are not similar. You cannot scale the rectangle to have it line up with the square. The proportions of the sides do not lead to the same ratio
100/4 = 25
2/4 = 0.5
so 100/4 = 2/4 is not a true equation. This numerically proves the figures are not similar.
side note: if you are working with triangles, then all you need are two pairs of congruent corresponding angles. If you have more than three sides for the polygon, then you'll need to confirm the sides are in proportion along with the angles being congruent as well.
Answer:
x>14
Step-by-step explanation:
X-3> 11
Add 3 to each side
X-3+3> 11+3
x > 14
The hole is open at 14 since it is greater than
( it would be closed if it were ≥) The line goes to the right since it is greater than
Two events are mutually exclusive if they cannot occur in the same trial of an experiment.
Answer:
true yes sir
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
okay so, i had a problem like this one and hated it, so ill try to help you out here
Step-by-step explanation:
If it is 81 all together it is safe to say the length and width is nine, making one mat six by 3, the little square being 3 by 3,
so the area of one mat would be six times three = 18
and if the width is 3, the length would be 6, unless it is cut in half, which we can assume it is not.
I hope this helps!
