The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
The gathering of factual statements is an example of marketing research in its descriptive role.
<span>The descriptive role of marketing research is focused on the gathering of facts to explain the current situation of a market and/or marketing program.</span>
Phyllis' RATE (percentage) of return is 7 percent
<u>Explanation:</u>
Data provided in the question:
Purchase price for each share = $50
Dividend received = $1 per share
worth of shares at the end of year = $52.50
Thus, total return on the share = dividend received plus worth of sahres at the end of year minus purchase price
= $1 plus $52.50 minus $50 = $3.5
Therfore, rate of return = [ total return on the shares by purchase price ] into 100%
= [$3.5 by $50] inot 100 percent
= 7 percent
hence, the option with 7 percent will be the correct answer.
Answer:
Getting a work-study job
Working at an on-campus job
Explanation:
The first option that will meet Matt's needs is to get a work-study job. A work-study job is like a financial aid program available in the universities to help students out of their financial needs. Work-study job is a part-time job that will enable Matt to work while studying at the University in California. It allows Matt to engage in a part-time job for some hours a week during his free time, like 20 hours a week while he studies in school and earns some money to subsidize the cost of his studies since Matt wants to avoid paying debt once he is out of school.
A work-study job is the best option for Matt's finance position because it will provide financial assistance for the cost of his education.
The other option for Matt is to work at an on-campus job. This is almost the same as a work-study job because it is a part-time job and carried out only in his free time. It is a part-time job done by students in the university while studying to help their financial needs. The only difference with the work-study job is that the job here will only be done on campus, unlike work-study job which can be done outside the campus. Here Matt will have to get a part-time job on campus and not outside the campus.
Answer:
Increase of 130 million
Explanation:
In this question, we are looking to evaluate what has happened to change in deferred tax assets. We proceed as follows;
Firstly, we calculate the current tax.
Mathematically = 40% of 400 million = 40/100 * 400 million = 160 million
Now, as we can see in the question, a decrease in deferred tax asset resulted in an increase in tax expense to a tune of $50 million
This brings the total tax expense to 160 million + 50 million = 210 million
We can see from the question that the company has only recognized a tax expense of $80 million.
This means that the change in deferred tax asset was an increase of 210 million- 80 million = $130 million
