The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Hedonists such as Epicurus and Mill have claimed that pleasure is the only thing worth pursuing its own sake. If some people would choose not to plug into the experience machine, does this show that hedonism is false?
No, what it means is that under the belief system and consideration of that individual, hedonism is not the way to receive pleasure and there would other activities or satisfactions that would report pleasure in doing them. Diversity in people's character and beliefs makes life more rich and interesting in that the search for pleasure has different ways, according to the satisfactoriness, values, and goals of each individual.
Although Hedonists such as Epicurus and Mill have claimed that pleasure is the only thing worth pursuing its own sake, other thinkers and philosophers considered that pleasure is the final result of getting accomplished that what made us thrive under different -and sometimes- difficult circumstances.
So pleasure, fr the sake of the pleasure it is not the only way to approach this.
Answer:
"My 5-year-old son still needs me to dress and undress him."
Explanation:
For the participant to say that her 5 year-old son still needs him or her to dress and undress him, this shows that she has not understood the motor skill required in children according to their age. A 5-year-old child should be able to dress and undress without needing assistance as it is a an expected motor skill for this age. Such child should be in the process of learning how to swim and skate, as these are also expected motor skill from a child of 5 years.
Yes, principles compelling people to action, found in all cultures and major world religions and these principles are known as moral imperatives.
A deeply held moral concept that compels someone to behave is known as a moral imperative. It is a type of Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative. According to Kant, the imperative was a rule of pure reason in its application. It was believed that breaking the moral code would be counterproductive and therefore unreasonable.
Every religion and culture teach human being to behave in a particular manner. These religion teach people to be humble with every other person. Through these principles, religion offers a means for us to assess moral activities and to reach moral conclusions.
To learn more about moral imperative here
brainly.com/question/14448741
#SPJ4
The correct answer is letter C, totalitarianism.
<span>Fascism was a doctrine of Totalitarianism where authoritarian control occurs within a certain state or governing branch of a particular institution. Often authoritative governments lead to major revolutions in society because there is lack of freedom of speech and expression. </span>