1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
3 years ago
12

How does a theocracy differ from a monarchy?

History
1 answer:
Anastasy [175]3 years ago
7 0
D. In a theocracy, people are governed by religious laws; in a monarchy, people may be governed by secular laws.

Theocracies are ruled by priests which rule in the name of a god. Monarchies are ruled by a sovereign such as a king, queen, or emperor who usually don't rule in the name of a god. 
You might be interested in
Which of the following was an idea that began as a minor party issue?
Stolb23 [73]
"Voting rights for women" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>was an idea that began as a minor party issue. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
The belief that the national government should not exceed its enumerated powers and that all other powers should be reserved to
Ipatiy [6.2K]
The answer is dual federalism
8 0
3 years ago
What was the missouri compromise? How did it effect our relationship with mexico?
Kitty [74]
How did the Missouri Compromise contribute to the Civil War?Others felt that it made the north seem more aggressive in its anti-slavery views and contributed to southern resentment, which may have led to the Civil War occurring sooner. The Missouri Compromise was meant to create balance between slave and non-slave states.
6 0
3 years ago
Does freedom mean that freed people will have economic opportunities equal to those of white people?
sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

In the case of the former slaves who became free after slavery was abolished, they were not always treated as such. Sure they were free in the eyes of the law, but many opportunities that a lot of white folk had weren't immediately available to everyone. In theory, being free could mean having more opportunities, but you have to remember just because you're free it doesn't mean you are guaranteed certain rights or opportunities as others are, it just means you have free will and you aren't in shackles. After all being free doesn't mean being fair or equal, and they are definitely not synonymous.

6 0
3 years ago
Explain why many Russians called for reforms in the early 1900s?
Jlenok [28]
In the early 1900s, Russia was one of the most impoverished countries in Europe with an enormous peasantry and a growing minority of poor industrial workers. ... The emancipation of serfs would influence the events leading up to the Russian Revolution by giving peasants more freedom to organize.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The significance of the American Revolution to world history cannot be emphasized enough. As the first successful independence m
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Albert Beveridge feel that the united states needed to hold onto the Philippines as a colony
    8·1 answer
  •  plzzzz
    11·1 answer
  • Feudal society was characterized by?
    5·1 answer
  • Effects of the Missouri compromise for Maine
    8·2 answers
  • n the resolution, what do the words “alien subjugation, domination and exploitation” most likely refer to? control by foreign po
    12·2 answers
  • How did the Aztecs strengthen their empire?
    9·1 answer
  • Most of the goods produced in Japan are sent out of the country to be sold in global markets. This fact makes Japan which type o
    14·1 answer
  • How did motivations for exploration and settlement affect European relations with American Indian cultures?
    7·1 answer
  • Which sequence of events is listed in the correct chronological order?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!