I really going to see if I can help you hold on????
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. Consumption = $670 + (30 × $75)
= $670 + $2250.
= $2920
Consumption is $2920
b. Investment = 0
c. Government Purchases = 0
d. Imports = Amount spent on foreign good = 30 × $75 = $2250
e. Exports = Amount of local goods sold to other countries = $100 × $45 = $4500
f. Net Exports = Export - Import
= $4500 - $2250.
= $2250
g. Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
= C + I + G + (X - M)
= 2920 + 0 + 0 + (2250)
= $2920 + $2250.
= $5170
Answer:
B
Explanation:
In a private closed economy (actual) investment is equal to saving at all levels of GDP and equilibrium occurs only at that level of GPD where (planned) investment is equal to saving.
Answer:
What would be the result? What additional information, if any, would you need to know to decide the case?
To determine who would win this case, we need to know two things:
- The non-compete agreement was supposed to last how many years, e.g. 1 or 2 years, maybe 3?
- When did Clifford Witter stopped working for Arthur Murray Dance Studios and when did he started to work for Fred Astaire Dancing Studios?
Most states consider non-compete agreements valid only if they last up to 2 or 3 years at most (which is considered a reasonable time). If Clifford started to work at Fred Astaire before the non-compete clause was over (assuming it lasted a reasonable time) then Arthur Murray would win. But if Clifford started to work at Fred Astaire after the non-compete clause was over, then there is nothing Arthur Murray can do to win the case.
Answer: C. Baker will prevail over Charlie because Baker recorded the deed before a Charlie paid Able for the property.
Explanation:
As soon as Baker accurately and immediately recorded the deed with the appropriate county offices after the property was conveyed to him, he took over ownership of the property from Able.
Able received money from Charlie and signed a new deed after this had happened so Baker would prevail because Baker, not Able, owns the property and so Able cannot sell what does not belong to him.