Answer:
C. $10,000 positive.
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that should be included is shown below:
= (Option strike price - spot rate) × purchased put options
= ($2.17 - $2.13) × 250,000
= $10,000
As the spot rate is less than the strike price so automatically there is a gain of $10,000
Hence, the option c is correct
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
The least that this option should sell for is $3,125.
Explanation:
Acording to the data, we have the following:
The current spot exchange is $1.55=€1.00
The call option has a strike price of $1.50=€1.00 and spot price is €62,500
Hence,to calculate the least value this option should sell for we have to calculate the following:
$1.55-$1.50=$0.05
Hence, $0.05*62,500= $3,125.
Answer:
Distributive bargaining
Explanation:
Distributive bargaining can be defined as a type of bargaining system/strategy in which one party gains only if the other party loses.
Distributive bargaining is mostly used when there is a negotiation that involves fixed resources e.g; money, assets, etc.
Distributive bargaining as a negotiation strategy does not aim to provide a win-win situation for all parties involved but that one party loses while the other gains considerably.
An example of distributive bargaining is a supermarket having a fixed price for an item. in that situation, you can't bargain and as such you either buy the item or leave the store.
That results in a win for the supermarket and a loss for you the buyer should yo choose to buy the item.
Cheers