<span>A sudden influx of wealth from military action would throw off the balance of wealth in that, while other non-military people may have previously been wealthy, they would now no longer be wealthier than the soldiers who served them. With too much wealth, the value of money would also go down, causing the economy to actually decline. Also, with such an influx of wealth to the already wealthy, a larger rift would be created between the wealthy and the poor. That this wealth was accrued through military action would encourage more military action and more violence.</span>
Short Answer: C
D is too restrictive
A and C are opposites so one of them is right and the other isn't. Sometimes you get luck with Multiple Choice. If you have to guess, this one is the kind of question you want to guess on. A is the opposite to what is true. The answer is C.
B Any asset can be something that can be a depreciating asset. A good example is a car or truck. Depreciating assets and not damaged assets.
Number one; hierarchy authority, the few top ranking officials.
Number two; job specialization, everyone has a job.
Number three; formalize rules, set established rules. All used to create efficiency
There should be peace in the county and their should be support
Answer:
individuals, cultures, and societies
Explanation: These are main and important parts of history.
