The 1967 Six- Day war from June 5 to June 10 in the Middle East has direct implication on Israel's reputation on its context to occupy lands in exchange for peace. There are also implications of the migration of Jordan people from the West Bank to the East Bank.
The correct answer for this question is "b. gained experience in seeking social and political change." By working in reform movements, many women <span>gained experience in seeking social and political change. They already have the voice to speak out what ideas they have for the betterment.</span>
Answer:
D. People in present day Arizona constructed a large circle of red-earthern boulders is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Native Americans have been living in Arizona for thousands of years and it is the state with the largest number of Native American population. The Navajo Nation which is the largest American Reservation in the US and Tohno Oodham Nation, both are located in Arizona. There are twenty tribes which are the member of Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona. More than twenty-five percent area of the Arizona state is reserved for tribals.
Answer:
Addison's mom is right.
Explanation:
While the library and the park are definitely important places to know in town, their not more important than the police station and the hospital. This is because both the police station and the hospital provide vital services can become a life and death matter.
Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.
Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).
Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.
The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.
For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.
Unilateralism
