Answer:
1. yes, this is justifiable because if someone is attacking you, you have to defend yourself.
2. Yes, even if the country is neutral, the people of that country should be protected against an invasion.
3. No, a lot of people die in wars and it isn't worth it just gor alliances.
4. No, war will not make your countru stronger in any way, it will just make things worse.
5. Yes, power and territory in other parts of the world will help your country gain influence if you are a good leader.
6. Yes, your country will not survive without certain resources.
7. No, a war will not prevent another war.
Elimination of poverty and racial injustice.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not include options to answer the question.
However, we can answer it based on our knowledge of the subject.
The arrival in Texas of the industries of munitions, shipbuilding, and petroleum was the direct result of the war.
Yes, industrialization and the fabrication of ships, supplies for the war, and the development of the oil industry was a direct result of the United States entering World War I.
With the United States entering the war, the troops at the war front needed all kinds of war supplies. Oil played a key role as an important raw material in the industries, as well as steel for shipbuilding. Industries had to work hard to comply with the war demanding and the US army necessities in Europe.
The economic term describes the rate at which products are manufactured would simply be "production rate", which in a market economy is determined mostly by the consumer demand.
Answer: America had placed an embargo on Japan due to their over achieving power and took over most of the South Pacific islands. Japan was wanting to upward/increase its oil for its war effort and saw the Pacific Fleet of the United States as its biggest threat.
