From the details that are contained in the question, the portfolio standard deviation is 0.0544 or 5.44%
<h3>How to solve for the portfolio standard deviation</h3>
w1 = weight of euros 1 = 500000/800000
w2 = weight of canadian dollars = 300000/800000
Standard deviation 1 = 8%
Standard deviation 2 = 3%
Correlation coefficient = 0.30
(w1*σ1)² + (w2*σ2)² + (2* w1*σ1* w2*σ2 * 0.30)^0.5
![((0.625*0.08)^{2} +(0.375*0.03)^{2} +(2*0.625*0.08*0.375*0.03*0.3)^0^.^5\\\\= 0.0544](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28%280.625%2A0.08%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%2B%280.375%2A0.03%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%2B%282%2A0.625%2A0.08%2A0.375%2A0.03%2A0.3%29%5E0%5E.%5E5%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%200.0544)
Therefore the portfolio standard deviation is given as 0.0544 or 5.44%
Read more on standard deviation here: brainly.com/question/475676
Answer: D. Transferability of investor ownership.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Roman owns shares in a company called Copnay Telecom Inc. and that the company's financial performance has been declining over the past few months, and the value of its stock has been decreasing.
We are further told that Roman wants to proactively cut his losses and therefore sells his shares and that Jeremy, a trading enthusiast, buys shares in Copnay Telecom because he believes that the share prices cannot go anywhere but up.
The characteristics of a public stock company that this scenario best exemplify is transferability of investor ownership. This was illustrated when Roman transferred his ownership to Jeremy.
Answer:
It is true the person above is wrong I have proof
Explanation:
Answer:
E) participative.
<u>The multiple-choice options for this question are: </u>
A) laissez-faire.
B) hands-off.
C) existential.
D) authoritarian.
E) participative.
Explanation:
In the participative leadership style, the manager invites employees' input when making all or most company decisions. The employees are adequate information regarding company issues. Each of the staff members is accorded an opportunity to make their contribution to the subject matter. If the team cannot reach a consensus, a majority vote determines the direction the company will take.
Participative leadership is criticized for slow f decision-making. Its main advantage is that decisions are easily acceptable by all, making implementation seamless.