Answer:
the contribution margin per unit for part A is $1,479,000
Explanation:
The computation of the contribution margin for part A is shown below:
Contribution margin per unit is
= $950 - $600 - $95
= $255
Now for contribution margin per unit for part A is
= 5,800 units × $255
= $1,479,000
Hence, the contribution margin per unit for part A is $1,479,000
This is an example of<u> "deductive reasoning".</u>
Deductive reasoning is a coherent procedure in which a conclusion depends on the concordance of numerous premises that are commonly thought to be valid.
Deductive reasoning is sometimes alluded to as top-down logic. Its partner, inductive thinking, is some of the time alluded to as base up rationale. Where deductive thinking continues from general premises to an explicit end, inductive thinking continues from explicit premises to a general end.
If you give options I can help you with it
In order for the deal to go through, you need to compare the owner’s current assets by looking at her. but because you also want to see the company’s, or profit and loss, for one year, you also ask to see her is a correct statement.
Current assets are liquid assets such as cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, stock inventories, marketable securities, and pre-paid obligations. The Current Assets account is crucial since it shows a company's capacity to fulfill its short-term commitments and short-term liquidity.
The money made when an item is sold for more than it cost to produce it is known as the profit. The loss, on the other hand, is the sum lost when an item is sold for less than its cost price.
To learn more about current assets
brainly.com/question/17318059
#SPJ4
1. Evidence-based management seems like common sense initially, but the reality is not that simple. Managers are often hired based on their experience. Therefore, people tend to believe their word more than they would believe some types of concrete evidence. Moreover, even when evidence does not change, it can be interpreted in various ways by different people, making objectivity impossible.
2. Sometimes, evidence-based management might not be the best approach. This would especially be the case in situations where a manager might be very experienced. It might be better to trust the manager's interpretation of events as opposed to what the evidence might suggest.
3. It is unlikely that automated evidence-based management could ever fully replace human decision-makers. This is because automated managers might not be sensitive enough to human matters that are important for a correct interpretation of evidence.
4. I would want to work under this system, as ultimately the system is most likely to lead to efficient outcomes. Moreover, under this system, all workers are treated in the same way.
