No, by definition a prime number is one where the only factors are 1 and itself. If some prime number is a multiple of another number, then that other number is a factor of the prime number. But that would make it composite (non-prime)
For example, the number 11 is prime. The only factors are 1 and itself. If we made the claim that 11 is a multiple of 2, then 2 would be a factor of 11 making 11 non-prime (as it doesn't just have 1 and itself as factors).
Note: If you have two numbers A and B, and you say that A is a factor of B, then A is the smaller value. Though there is the exception when A = B. For example, saying "8 is a factor of 16" has 8 being the smaller value.
Another note: if you say "A is a multiple of B", then B is larger than A. The exception is when A = B. Example: "100 is a multiple of 5"
Answer:
Answer:
102.5, 103.5
Step-by-step explanation:
a+a+1=206
2a+1=206
2a=205
a=102.5
103.5
I think there is a bug here. They can't be whole numbers.
Step-by-step explanation:
Y = 3/2x + b
4 = 3/2(-10) + b
4 = -15 + b, b = 19
Y = 3/2x + 19
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
.48 rounds down
.5 rounds up
Answer:
C and D
Step-by-step explanation:
A number used to multiply a variable. Example: 6z means 6 times z, and "z" is a variable, so 6 is a coefficient.
