1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedbober [7]
3 years ago
8

I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unne

cessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. —Alexander Hamilton, the Federalist Paper 84 What point is Alexander Hamilton making? A. A bill of rights was necessary for ratification. B. A bill of rights should include only certain rights. C. The Constitution did not need a bill of rights. D. The Constitution is stronger with a bill of rights.
History
2 answers:
MaRussiya [10]3 years ago
8 0

As we celebrate the 4th of July, let's ask the question: Did the Framers make a mistake by amending the Constitution with the Bill of Rights? Would Americans have more liberty today had there not been a Bill of Rights? You say, "Williams, what's wrong with you? America without the Bill of Rights is unthinkable!" Let's look at it.

After the 1787 Constitutional Convention, there were intense ratification debates about the proposed Constitution. Both James Madison and Alexander Hamilton expressed grave reservations about Thomas Jefferson's, George Mason's and others insistence that the Constitution be amended by the Bill of Rights. It wasn't because they had little concern with liberty guarantees. Quite to the contrary they were concerned about the loss of liberties.

Alexander Hamilton expressed his concerns in Federalist Paper No. 84, "[B]ills of rights . . . are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous." Hamilton asks, "For why declare that things shall not be done [by Congress] which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given [to Congress] by which restrictions may be imposed?" Hamilton's argument was that Congress can only do what the Constitution specifically gives it authority to do. Powers not granted belong to the people and the states. Another way of putting Hamilton's concern: why have an amendment prohibiting Congress from infringing on our right to play hopscotch when the Constitution gives Congress no authority to infringe upon our hopscotch rights in the first place.

Alexander Hamilton added that a Bill of Rights would "contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more [powers] than were granted. . . . [it] would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power." Going back to our hopscotch example, those who would usurp our God-given liberties might enact a law banning our playing hide-and-seek. They'd justify their actions by claiming that nowhere in the Constitution is there a guaranteed right to play hide-and-seek. They'd say, "hopscotch yes, but hide-and-seek, no."

To mollify Alexander Hamilton's fears about how a Bill of Rights might be used as a pretext to infringe on human rights, the Framers added the Ninth Amendment. The Ninth Amendment reads: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Boiled down to its basics, the Ninth Amendment says it's impossible to list all of our God-given or natural rights. Just because a right is not listed doesn't mean it can be infringed upon or disparaged by the U.S. Congress. Applying the Ninth Amendment to our example: just because playing hopscotch is listed and hide-and-seek is not doesn't mean that we don't have a right to play hide-and-seek.

How do courts see the Ninth Amendment today? It's more than a safe bet to say that courts, as well as lawyers, treat the Ninth Amendment with the deepest of contempt. In fact, I believe, that if any appellant's lawyer argued Ninth Amendment protections on behalf of his client, he would be thrown out of court if not disbarred. That's what the Ninth Amendment has come to mean today. I believe we all have a right to privacy, but how do you think a Ninth Amendment argument claiming privacy rights would fly with information gathering agencies like the Internal Revenue Service? Try to assert your rights to privacy in dealing with the IRS and other government agencies and I'll send you cigarettes and candy while you're in jail.

bixtya [17]3 years ago
5 0

C. The Constitution did not need the BILL of Right.


You might be interested in
Use the table below to note briefly how some european examples of nationalities dealt with the issue of statehood and the pursui
xxMikexx [17]
Well there isn't a table but I can briefly explain this: 

France - When ruled by kings, the people went to war out of loyalty to their king. Under Napoleon Bonaparte, people went to war on the beliefs of French principles. 

Germany - All German-speaking parts of Europe constitute one nationality should be one state. They pursued their goals forcefully (no one trying to stop them) and captured the German part of Czechoslovakia. (Nazi's)

I hope this helps. 
4 0
2 years ago
What were monasteries known for?
Fiesta28 [93]
A monastery is a building or complex of buildings comprising the domestic quarters and workplaces of monastics, monks or nuns<span>, whether living in communities or alone (hermits). A monastery generally includes a place reserved for prayer which may be a chapel, church or temple, and may also serve as an oratory.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
How did Dollar Diplomacy help prevent costly wars?
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

It spread American Influence through business

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Base your answers to the question on the drawing and on your knowledge of social studies.
erastova [34]
Do you have a picture of the drawing
7 0
2 years ago
The French sent explorers in the early 1500s for what
damaskus [11]
To find  new trade routes
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Federalists supported ratification of the constitution because they wanted a
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the Germans allow Lenin to return to Russia
    6·1 answer
  • What are the POLITICAL differences between the north and the south in the 1800’s
    12·2 answers
  • Who would most likely support the state of Maryland's position in the Supreme Court case of McCulloch vMaryland?
    7·1 answer
  • where shipyards bulit along the coast in the great depression or where they built in world War 1 or world War 2
    5·2 answers
  • William Penn referred to his colony as a “Holy Experiment” because
    7·2 answers
  • 3. Explain how sectionalism played an important role in party
    15·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer,
    14·1 answer
  • In what way were noble ladies and peasant women
    11·1 answer
  • Answer the questions.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!