1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Simora [160]
3 years ago
8

In what ways did Nationalism contribute to the start of World War I? Select all that apply.

History
2 answers:
stepan [7]3 years ago
7 0

Question: In what ways did Nationalism contribute to the start of World War I? Select all that apply.

  • It created tension between European powers.  
  • Countries adopted neutrality policies.  
  • Countries developed new technology and war weapons.  
  • Ethnic groups were seeking self-determination.

Answer: The correct answer is: <u>It created tension between European powers</u>, because nationalist groups contributed to the weakening of the Ottoman Empire in eastern Europe, by seeking to throw off Muslim rule. This inspired the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo in June 1914 and Austria blamed Serbia for the killing of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand. which led directly to the outbreak of World War I.

Alisiya [41]3 years ago
3 0

Many nations, on the eve of the First World War, also known as the "Great War", have become aware of the emancipation of a national being. Immediately before the Great War, liberation wars for the liberation of the Balkan peoples from the Turks were led. The Great Turkish Empire was already reduced in 1913 to more or less the area of ​​today's Turkey. National consciousness grew among the people who were within the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, mainly the Slovenian peoples. On the other hand, Germany's expansionist tendencies have grown, fueled by nationalism, as are tensions between the great powers.  All this, of course, when it comes to great powers,  have interest and profit for the background. It emphasizes nationalism at the forefront as a tool for achieving goals. This leads to the arming of these great powers and the improvement of the technology of warfare.

When all this is done, the great powers strive to expand, arm themselves, expand their own war arsenal, and the smaller ethnic group strives for the liberation of those parts still under Austro-Hungarian rule. These are the Serbs' aspirations for the parts of Bosnia where the Serbs live to be free as the already free parts of the Balkans with the Serbian population, after the expulsion of the Turks. There is the aspiration of other nations in Austria-Hungary to free themselves.

The Austro-Hungarian interest was to build the Vienna-Istanbul railroad and here they saw Serbia as an obstacle. In this general conflict, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo in June 1914 was carried out. This was a direct cause for war, and the background was all previously mentioned that nationalism:

Created tension between Europian powers,

Countries developed new technology and war weapons,

Ethnic groups were seeking self-determination

You might be interested in
(GIVING BRAINLYIST) Read the excerpt from Votes for Women:
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

The best way for women to get vote is that they first they argue over and over so women could vote in several states until President Woodrow Wilson to finally support women's suffrage.

Explanation:

They argued that voting women would benefit society, and published newspaper articles and other literature about women's rights. From 1878 until 1920, the idea of women's suffrage was brought before Congress every year. In the meantime, women also campaigned for the vote in different states. During World War I, many women did jobs regularly done by men. Their contributions to the United States and the influence of Carrie Chapman Catt caused President Woodrow Wilson to finally support women's suffrage.

PS: I hope this help and Have an Amazing Day!!

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did President Lincoln's argument that secession was not constitutional?
kaheart [24]

Why did President Lincoln's argument that secession was not constitutional?

Answer is c

5 0
2 years ago
How does Lucas say the signers of the Declaration of Independence created the sense that war was inevitable?
MArishka [77]

If you study the declaration of independence closely, it us clear that the declaration demands rights. And the oppressive regimes of the world would be unwilling to grant those rights. In order to achieve those rights, one will have to fight. And that will pave the way for war. It has become evident now after centuries. United States believed in the rights and freedom of the people. That had the U.S entering the world wars. All the wars after that too, were basically based on this very idea. FREEDOM.

8 0
3 years ago
What agency did the government create to ensure production of war materials and resolve labor disputes?
lisabon 2012 [21]
It was the national war labor board...in 1942 president FDR brought back Woodrow Wilson's National War Labor Board or (NWLB), in hopes of stopping or at least slowing down the labor management conflict in WW2.

I really hope that helped and its what you were looking for!<span />
4 0
3 years ago
In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The us gave military aid to _______ to fight against communism in vietnam in the 1950's
    14·1 answer
  • What was the main reason imperial nations built large naval forces? to initiate sea-based attacks on other nations to demonstrat
    14·2 answers
  • Why was Ronald Reagan known as “The Great Communicator”?
    12·1 answer
  • What event led to bloodshed in Missouri after it had declared itself neutral in the war?
    14·1 answer
  • Give some reasons for Canada to have a separate legislation for young offenders. (Why make the YCJA for young offenders instead
    15·1 answer
  • Vertical integration
    5·1 answer
  • What was The German bombing of London during World War II called
    11·1 answer
  • 6) Name TWO achievements of Alexander Hamilton besides authorship of the Federalist Papers.
    15·2 answers
  • How did American agriculture support other industries?
    12·2 answers
  • Which action is an example of political lobbying? A The governor gives special advice to legislative members. B A mayoral candid
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!