Answer: Walking is better than a car ride because walking has various health benefits, it does not cause air pollution, it does not cause noise pollution either, it does not contribute to traffic issues, it is the cheapest method of commute, and one is less likely to meet any serious accidents while walking.
Explanation: Walking has been counted in the best exercises for the body for ages. Doctors and physicians prescribe walking over using cars because walking helps regulate a number of functions in the body and also helps reduce excess fat. From the conversation point of view, walking should be preferred because it is environment-friendly. Walking does not leave a carbon footprint and causes no harm to the surrounding. More people walking would mean less vehicular traffic on the road, and ultimately more convenience in managing the traffic. Other than being healthy, walking is also 'safe' as a pedestrian is less likely to meet a deadly road accident than a car driver is. Moreover, walking costs way less than driving a car does.
Answer:
Maybe you could talk about your day to day life. Or maybe you could write about how the virus has changed your life. I think it would be really cool if you wrote a letter to your future child telling them about what is going on.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
I believe the last time i saw this question it was c............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ c. o. u. l. d. b. e. w. r. o. n. g.
Answer:
Pretty sure its Offred. Hope I'm right.
Answer:
Poisonous gases blistered soldiers' skin, eyes, and lungs.
Explanation:
Poisonous gases are extremely toxic. Many soldiers in WWI suffered injuries due to it, such as the ones listed above. We can also use the process of elimination to identify the answer.
❌<u>Choice 2</u>: Poisonous gases brought an end to trench warfare.
- This isn't the case. If anything, the gasses brought trench warfare more to the forefront. Also, trench warfare was used in WWII, so it's illogical to claim that it ended during WWI.
❌<u>Choice 3</u>: Poisonous gases melted weapons and other armaments.
- There is no evidence of this.
❌<u>Choice 4</u>: Poisonous gases caused explosions in the presence of gunpowder.
- Once again, no evidence supports this. Also, the main purpose of poisonous gas was not to cause explosions, regardless.
