I believe it was, "<span>Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong." But I'm not quite sure. </span>
Adam Smith theories promote individualism in the sense that they state that, when each economic agent (households, business, or public entities) pursue their own interests selfishly, the outcomes generated by their economic activities will optimize the social welfare.
The incentives behind working for the own profit are much higher, and make individuals more productive and more sensitive to mistakes, therefore they are keen on improving their practices constantly. In turn, the incentives of working for the common interest are more vague, and such situations lead to sharp productivity declines. It is more likely that societies with greater productivity are able to produce efficiently enough goods and services to cover the needs of all its citizens. Therefore those societies end up maximizing the social welfare. These are the main arguments which support the invisible hand principle coined by Adam Smith.
Answer:they can cause the economy to crash since the conflict will usually drift people apart and that is were segeragation came in.
Explanation:
if people argue and fight or just don't like each other they stay away from each other.
<span>Wright Mills claimed that the sociological imagination transformed the way that we process certain information, to then turn it in to our own bright and new idea. These new perspectives can then be derived from this idea, to then form an entirely new one.</span>
