1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amiraneli [1.4K]
3 years ago
8

To what degree is it understandable for England and France to pursue a policy of Peace through Appeasement?

History
1 answer:
Llana [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Appeasement was the right policy for England because it gave them time to prepare and get there army together. Appeasement allowed them to have peace and no conflict for a while which is a good outcome of appeasement. Lord Halifax even promoted appeasement because it allowed them to prepare for the war which happened within a year.

Explanation: It's understandable that having peace through appeasement would put England in advantage during the war and France could focus on theirselves.

You might be interested in
What are the roles of the local governments? A.operate public schools B.provide a military C. Judge federal cases
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Paano ka makabuo ng pasya​
astra-53 [7]

Pag isipan munang mabuti ang bawat desisyon at hakbang na gagawin mo. Maaari kasing magdulot ito ng pagsisisi sa huli kapag padalos dalos ka sa iyong kilos. Dapat isipin mo muna kung ano yung maaaring kahinatnan ng gagawin mo, ang pagiisip ng malalim ay makatutulong upang maging tama ang iyong pagpapasya

3 0
3 years ago
What are the names of the three Spanish settlements
Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

Pueblos. Towns which became the centers of trade.

Mission. Religious communities that included a small town, surronding farmland and a church.

Presidios. Forts, typically built near the missions.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would the world be different if the Columbian Exchange never happened?
miss Akunina [59]

When Europeans first touched the shores of the Americas, Old World crops such as wheat, barley, rice, and turnips had not traveled west across the Atlantic, and New World crops such as maize, white potatoes, sweet potatoes, and manioc had not traveled east to Europe. In the Americas, there were no horses, cattle, sheep, or goats, all animals of Old World origin. Except for the llama, alpaca, dog, a few fowl, and guinea pig, the New World had no equivalents to the domesticated animals associated with the Old World, nor did it have the pathogens associated with the Old World’s dense populations of humans and such associated creatures as chickens, cattle, black rats, and Aedes egypti mosquitoes. Among these germs were those that carried smallpox, measles, chickenpox, influenza, malaria, and yellow fever.

The Columbian exchange of crops affected both the Old World and the New. Amerindian crops that have crossed oceans—for example, maize to China and the white potato to Ireland—have been stimulants to population growth in the Old World. The latter’s crops and livestock have had much the same effect in the Americas—for example, wheat in Kansas and the Pampa, and beef cattle in Texas and Brazil. The full story of the exchange is many volumes long, so for the sake of brevity and clarity let us focus on a specific region, the eastern third of the United States of America.

As might be expected, the Europeans who settled on the east coast of the United States cultivated crops like wheat and apples, which they had brought with them. European weeds, which the colonists did not cultivate and, in fact, preferred to uproot, also fared well in the New World. John Josselyn, an Englishman and amateur naturalist who visited New England twice in the seventeenth century, left us a list, “Of Such Plants as Have Sprung Up since the English Planted and Kept Cattle in New England,” which included couch grass, dandelion, shepherd’s purse, groundsel, sow thistle, and chickweeds. One of these, a plantain (Plantago major), was named “Englishman’s Foot” by the Amerindians of New England and Virginia who believed that it would grow only where the English “have trodden, and was never known before the English came into this country.” Thus, as they intentionally sowed Old World crop seeds, the European settlers were unintentionally contaminating American fields with weed seed. More importantly, they were stripping and burning forests, exposing the native minor flora to direct sunlight and to the hooves and teeth of Old World livestock. The native flora could not tolerate the stress. The imported weeds could, because they had lived with large numbers of grazing animals for thousands of years.

Cattle and horses were brought ashore in the early 1600s and found hospitable climate and terrain in North America. Horses arrived in Virginia as early as 1620 and in Massachusetts in 1629. Many wandered free with little more evidence of their connection to humanity than collars with a hook at the bottom to catch on fences as they tried to leap over them to get at crops. Fences were not for keeping livestock in, but for keeping livestock out.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which two ways did Justinian I leave his mark on the Byzantine Empire?
Leya [2.2K]
He recreated the laws, and he created a code of law for the empire. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One charachteristic of davy crickett
    10·1 answer
  • What differences between the colonies of New England and the Chesapeake led to success for one and difficult existance for the o
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of socialism did Karl Marx subscribe to? A. utopian socialism B. practical socialism C. scientific
    5·2 answers
  • Both Pike and Lewis and Clark started exploring in witch city
    9·1 answer
  • Largest migration in american history
    10·2 answers
  • What was the scopes trial really about?
    12·1 answer
  • How did manorialism and feudalism come to dominate medieval europe?
    12·1 answer
  • Who started the lgbtq movement ? tell me about the person :)
    10·1 answer
  • 1. Move Alexander's Army through the map based on your answers to the questions below. 2. If the answer is true, you move forwar
    11·1 answer
  • What were the causes of Hoovers responses and what effect did those causes have on Hoovers responses?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!