Answer:Rule of law
Explanation:This is a principle which legally monitors the actions of all people and Institutions to ensure that they abide by the law and that the law
This is a governmental principle which is guided by supremacy of law, equality before the law , accountability to the law,justice and legal certainty
Well your vote counts but majority wins, you might not agree with the person who’s won but all counts are final. That’s why it’s best to vote for someone who is qualified to run congress/office so you’ll have to deal with it and if you don’t, you’ll always have the right to protest.
Answer:
d. Formal
Explanation:
Formal analysis: The term "formal analysis" is described as one of the specific types of "visual description" or is considered as an important technique to organize "visual information".
Formal analysis is considered as a particular explanation related to visual structure in such a way that a few visual elements are supposed to be function and arranged withing a specific composition and therefore formal analysis is not responsible for evoking a particular piece of work in any of the reader's mind.
Formal analysis can be applied in a variety of work including art, cultural artifact, sculpture, or painting, etc.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the formal analysis.
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
I️ think the answers is schizophrenia because they see different things and also hear things as well
