1. The Inuit live in the Arctic regions of North America, a very inhospitable environment. This community faces the problem of living in a tundra climate, constantly covered by snow and ice. However, they have developed innovative methods of transportation and housing.
The Inuit developed the kayak to travel through the icy water and for hunting. They also developed dog sleds, which allowed them to travel on land.
In terms of housing, they developed the igloo (a temporary shelter made from snow) to live during the winter, and the tupiq (a tent made out of animal skin).
2. The Northeastern cultures of the U. S. found an innovative way to reduce conflict, of which they suffered constantly, in the form of the Iroquois Confederacy.
The Confederacy was created in 1142 by the Great Peacemaker (<em>Deganawida</em>). It brought together five nations of the southern Great Lakes area into the “Great League of Peace.” The Iroquois remained an undivided political unit until the Revolutionary War.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "revenue." Economies of scale involve decreasing revenue as output rises. Given that the revenue decreases, then the output of the economy should be increased.
The Britishers had the bigger advantage of becoming rich than the French people which will allow them to provide better products to the native Americans whereas the French tried to understand the lifestyle of the native Americans and respected them.
<h3>Why did the Britishers want Ohio River Valley?</h3>
Great Britain and France each claimed the Ohio River Valley. British settlers desired to farm the wealthy soil there, and the French desired to entice beavers and change the furs.
But French understood the lifestyle of the native Americans and wanted to give service to them according to their needs.
Hence, The Britishers had the bigger advantage of becoming rich in the Ohio valley over the french, and because of this reason they wanted the Ohio valley.
learn more about Ohio River Valley:
brainly.com/question/897465
#SPJ1
Answer:
The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the popular vote to win the electoral vote, and a strong third-party candidate could win enough electoral votes to prevent either major-party candidate from receiving a majority of votes.
Explanation:
Most critics against the Electoral College state as one of their primary reasons the idea of the winner-take-all system allowing a candidate who has lost the popular vote to still win the electoral vote. Furthermore, they claim that a powerful third-party candidate could not only pull votes away from the major candidates but also bargain their way into the Electoral College.
Answer: Heliocentrism
Explanation:
Humanism is the devotion to the welfare of human beings. Materialism explains that all things are formed as a result of material interactions.
Geocentrism proposed by Ptolemy explains that the Earth is placed in the center of the universe.
Heliocentrism proposed by Nicholas Copernicus states that the Earth and other planets are all at the center of the universe revolving around the sun. It contradicted the traditional Christian views about the universe.
