5 is the correct answer I believe
The data given as a whole would be called ungrouped data. Now to get the variance, you will need the formula:
s^2= <u>Σ(x-mean)^2</u>
n
x = raw data
mean = average of all data
n = no. of observations
s^2 = variance
Now we do not have the mean yet, so you have to solve for it. All you need to do is add up all the data and divide it by the number of observations.
Data: <span>90, 75, 72, 88, 85 n= 5
</span>Mean=<u>Σx</u>
n
Mean = <u>90+75+72+88+85 </u> = <u>410</u> = 82
5 5
The mean is 82. Now we can make a table using this.
The firs column will be your raw data or x, the second column will be your mean and the third will be the difference between the raw data and the mean and the fourth column will be the difference raised to two.
90-82 = 8
8^2 =64
75-82 = -7
-7^2 =49
72-82 = -10
-10^2=100
88-82=6
6^2 = 12
85-82=3
3^2=9
Now you have your results, you can now tabulate the data:
x mean x-mean (x-mean)^2
90 82 8 64
75 82 -7 49
72 82 -10 100
88 82 6 36
85 82 3 9
Now that you have a table, you will need the sum of (x-mean)^2 because the sigma sign Σ in statistics, means "the sum of."
64+49+100+36+9 = 258
This will be the answer to your question. The value of the numerator of the calculation will be 258.
<u>
</u>
He needs 3 Tickets to Win a Prize.27×2 is... And that's ur Answer
The lengths of the rectangles are 7 and 12 respectively. Form the ratio 7/12. The widths of the rects. are x and 5 respectively. Form the ratio x/5. Now equate these two ratios:
7 x
--- = ---
12 5
Solve this for x. One way to do this would be to cross-multiply, obtaining 12x = 35, and solving this result for x. x will be a fraction. Write the numerator and denominator in the boxes given.
A scalene triangle can never be an isosceles triangle. How? Well, let's take a look at the definition of a scalene triangle. In short, a scalene triangle is a classification of a triangle that does not have any congruent sides. On the other hand, an isosceles triangle is a triangle in which its legs are both congruent. Therefore, if a scalene triangle has two congruent legs, it wouldn't even be a scalene triangle, but instead it would be an isosceles triangle. Hope this helped!
