1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hoa [83]
3 years ago
8

Need answer 10, us history

History
2 answers:
adell [148]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I´m pretty sure that it´s A

Naddik [55]3 years ago
6 0
English captured Fort Duquesne
You might be interested in
What made Spain richer and stronger throughout the 1500's?
maria [59]
<span>Spain was really the first global superpower, although it might share that limelight with Portugal. Spain (and Portugal) were the first states to be able to truly project their power around the globe,and extend economic relations (i.e., trade) globally as well. After Ferdinand and Isabella united the Castille-Leon and Aragon crowns in 1492 to form the Spanish kingdom, the Habsburgs took over the Spanish imperial throne in the early 1500s, at a time when the Habsburgs ruled the Holy Roman Empire (i.e., most of Germany, Austria, eastern France, Netherlands, Switzerland, northern Italy, Bohemia, "Royal" Hungary, as well as southern Italy (Sicily and Naples). The Habsburg-Spanish imperial empire was at its height under Charles V and his son, Philip II in the 1500s, when Spanish troops were on the Rhine River, in South America, in the Philippines (named after Philip II), in Albania, and elsewhere. Under Philip II the Habsburg empire was split in two, with a Central European (Austria-based) half, and a Western European (Spanish) half. Unfortunately the Spanish wasted much of the vast amounts of money (in the form of silver) pouring into the Spanish treasury from Peru, mostly in fruitless wars trying to suppress Protestantism in Central and northern Europe, and by 1600 Dutch, French and English ships were intruding on Spanish imperial interests and establishing their own colonies. But for most of the 1500s, Spain was easily the world's premier military power.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Hat was the result of the Supreme Court ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden?
diamong [38]
The main result of the Supreme Court ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden was that "<span>The Court defined interstate commerce and declared federal law supreme over state law," since the ruling was that the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce applied to navigation as well. </span>
3 0
2 years ago
Popular sovereignty is the idea that
guapka [62]
Is belief that the legitimacy of the state is created by the will or consent of its people
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read this sentence from an informative essay. After the Civil War, the amount of counterfeit money in circulation was a big prob
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Parenthetical citations reference the original sources that are used in an essay or paper. <u>It immediately tells the reader where your data is coming from, and shourtcuts the unnecessary trouble of having to make footnotes</u>.

For print sources like books, magazines, <u>or the encyclopidia given in your example</u>, you have to provide the author's last name and the page number in the source material from where your citation comes from.

It would look like this: "After the Civil War, the amount of counterfeit money in circulation was a big problem for the government" (Ray 34).

When it comes to electronic sources, the absence of page numbers should not be a problem in creating parenthetical citations. All you have to do is provide the author's or article's name; and unless you must list the website's URL to give the reader a direct entry to the page, do not include entire URLs in the text. Instead, provide partial URLs like the name of the website or its domain.

In this case, your example would look like this: "After the Civil War, the amount of counterfeit money in circulation was a big problem for the government" (Know Your Money, Secretservice.gov).


Hope this helps!


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the battle of the Alamo and the battle of San Jancinto similar and how were they different?​
Rasek [7]

Answer:

The outcomes were very different:  

Texians were defeated at The Battle of the Alamo by Mexican President, Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna and his forces.  

Texian army commander Sam Houston ordered a retreat.  

During the battle of San Jacinto, Santa Anna was captured and forced to order his troops out of Texas, ending Mexican control of the area, which subsequently became the Republic of Texas.  

Similarly, both sides were trying to regain back control of land.  

Mexican forces arrived in San Antonio de Bexar on February 23 and initiated a siege to regain control of the area.  

There is more information here:  

http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/...

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did prince henry encourage the work of cartographers
    13·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Americans in the new nation might have wanted to move to and settle on western lands?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did spain and portugal seek a new route to asia?
    6·2 answers
  • How could you use the cartoon to criticize American imperialism?
    12·1 answer
  • Answer Correctly!
    13·1 answer
  • Why was slavery important in the south prior to the Civil War
    7·1 answer
  • Lyndon Johnson referred to the passing of ___________ as a final tribute to President Kennedy.​
    15·1 answer
  • Which language is spoken by most people in iran
    13·2 answers
  • Historically, evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that that vast majority of people who carry out acts of violence and/or genoc
    12·1 answer
  • Before about 1650, tobacco plantations in North America and the Caribbean were largely staffed by
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!