1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
4 years ago
11

How were the religious beliefs of the Olmec different from those of the Egyptians?

History
1 answer:
Eduardwww [97]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the Olmec believed in a limited number of gods associated with animals and nature... i think...

Explanation:

Their religion centered around eight gods with animals an nature

You might be interested in
Why did the Founding Fathers replace the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution?
LenaWriter [7]
There were several reasons why the Founding Fathers replaced the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution, but the main one is that the Articles gave Congress no power to tax the states, which was very much needed for debt payments. 
4 0
4 years ago
How do schifter and christopher counter the argument that human rights and democracy are not valued by many people in the world
iren [92.7K]
These two people counter the argument that human rights and democracy are not valued by many people in the world by pointing to all the nations in which it exists. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read this paragraph and answer the question that follows.
wolverine [178]

Answer: intricate wooden carvings and elaborate marble designs

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which group came to North Carolina in the greatest numbers because of the gold rush?
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

American

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the Scott v. Stanford case the Supreme Court
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

Explanation:Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them. The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do historians study primary and secondary resources?
    13·1 answer
  • How was the blimp used when it was originally used?
    12·1 answer
  • The most important factor in the rise of spain as a major european power was the:
    13·1 answer
  • Which country’s colonist claimed the Mississippi River basin for their nation?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Greeks defeat the Persian army? A. They used an effective military formation known as a phalanx. B. They had many mo
    8·2 answers
  • The nazi party was also known as the nationalist socialist German worker's party. True or false?
    11·1 answer
  • Brainiest to whoever get it right!!!
    14·1 answer
  • When did Ghana exist when
    12·1 answer
  • Explain one way the image above reflects changes in workplaces in the period 1750-1900
    6·1 answer
  • Do you agree that the Electoral College is still the most
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!