1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisabon 2012 [21]
3 years ago
8

What aggrement did the united states and great britain reach about the oregon territory

History
2 answers:
quester [9]3 years ago
6 0
<span>set boundary on 49th parallel</span>
Oliga [24]3 years ago
6 0
I think this may help you Originally Spain, Great Britain, Russia, and the United States claimed the territory. In 1819, under terms of the Transcontinental Treaty, Spain ceded its claims to the territory to the United States. Shortly thereafter the United States contested a unilateral Russian move to grant its citizens a fishing, whaling, and commercial monopoly from the Bering Straits to the 51st parallel. In 1823 President Monroe promulgated his doctrine, which put Russia on notice that the United States did not accept Russian attempts at monopoly. The U.S. claim was based on the explorations of Lewis and Clark and on the establishment of trading posts set up by John Jacob Astor<span>’s Pacific Fur Company, such as Astoria at the mouth of the Columbia River. Great Britain based its claim, in part, on James Cook’s exploration of the Columbia River</span>
You might be interested in
in which region of the globe did the spread of diseases though the columbian exchange drastically reduce populations?
Inessa [10]
The discovery of the New world set in motion many changes. For example, 50 years after Columbus had arrived in the Caribbean 90% of the native population of the island Hispanola were dead from smallpox. Many diseases came from animals. Cows brought tuberculosis to American continent and from horses and pigs native Indians got influenza. The result was that those diseases drastically reduced populations in America. Answer: <span>America.</span><span />
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select all the correct answers,
Ivanshal [37]

Answer:hshahajaja

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
1. How did the Enlightenment and American Revolution change the way people viewed their relationship to their rulers?
topjm [15]
The enlightenment had made them realize the inequality in the government. The American revolution had inspired other countries to rebel against the injustice in the government and law.
5 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP ME! DUE NOW! **BRAINLIEST** 15PTS
djyliett [7]

Answer:

War is not only about the military but also about the resources.

Explanation:

War is not just about fighting on the battlefield. It requires some economic investment, so this is one of the more essential factors. The Union initially chose an offensive strategy that entailed attacks on the Confederacy's three territories backed by economic pressures. The Union also had a strong navy, so blocking the coast for the opposing side was a powerful blow to their economy. This strategy entailed a slow economic weakening of the opponents, which was ultimately crucial in the war.

The Confederacy was in an awkward position; they wanted to retain the right to secession. Their efforts to invade the North are a very thankless situation. The developed North, with infrastructure, could quickly move an army from one place to another. In that case, the Confederation had to agree to the fact that the North decides the time and place of the battle, which is an advantage at the outset. The Confederacy deployed troops along the borders, which contributed to the dispersal of the army. It acted offensively when the opportunity arose for such a manoeuvre. One example of offensive action is the attempt to conquer Colorado mines, which failed.

Such a constellation of relations contributed to the North's commitment to war. Developed industry, infrastructure, and economic blockade of the south are crucial factors in the victory of the North over the south.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. How might the location of the Philippines be beneficial to the US?
QveST [7]
<span>the Philippines has emerged as what Carter in January termed “a central part” of the Obama administration’s rebalance, particularly in the security realm. In no small part due to China’s growing assertiveness in the South China Sea, Manila has cemented itself as a key location for America’s military presence; an exemplar of partnering both with Washington as well as its regional allies like Japan and Australia; and an upholder of international principles in the maritime security domain. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was a major problem with the central government under the articles of confederation
    7·1 answer
  • Read the passage from a letter by Christopher Columbus.
    14·2 answers
  • Parts of Oklahoma, Kansas, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico were acquired following the __________.
    10·1 answer
  • Beware of trojan horses is a common piece of advice. explain the historical context of this phrase
    14·1 answer
  • The electoral college
    13·1 answer
  • What key role did the location of the Tigris and the Euphrates river play on the development of Mesopotamia?
    15·2 answers
  • Although not always labeled a Red Scare in the history books which of the following could be considered one of the first example
    14·1 answer
  • The largest single Jewish revolt occurred at the
    8·2 answers
  • What form of entertainment was inspired by religion?
    6·2 answers
  • The Treaties of Westphalia in 1648 institutionalized the concept of the nation-state.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!