1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlladinOne [14]
3 years ago
5

Conduct a full hypothesis test and determine if the given claim is supported or not supported at the 0.05 significance level. A

manufacturer considers his production process to be out of control when defects exceed 3%. In a random sample of 85 items, the defect rate is 5.8% but the manager claims that this is only a sample fluctuation and production is not really out of control. Test whether the manufacturer's claim that production is out of control is supported or not supported.
Mathematics
1 answer:
monitta3 years ago
8 0

Solution:-

- The population proportion, P = 0.03 ( 3 % )

- The sample proportion, p = 0.058 ( 5.8 % )]

- The sample size , n = 85.

- State the hypothesis:

                   Null hypothesis : P = 0.03 ( 3 % )

                   Alternate hypothesis : P ≥ 0.03 ( 3 % )

- The rejection region is defined by the significance level α:

                         significance α = 0.05

                         Z-critical = Z_α = Z_0.05

                         p-value = Z_0.05 = 1.645

- The Z-statistics:

                   Z = \frac{\sqrt{n}*(p - P ) }{\sqrt{P*(1-P)} }\\\\Z = \frac{\sqrt{85}*(0.058 - 0.03 ) }{\sqrt{0.03*(1-0.03)} }\\\\Z = 1.5132

- Compare against the rejection value ( p - value ):

                   Z-critical = 1.645

                   Z-test = 1.5132

                   Z-test  < Z-critical  ... ( Null not rejected )

- We fail to reject the Null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the manager's claim that the production process is out of control. Hence, we can support that the production process is not out of control.

You might be interested in
What is the value of x? A.86 B.60 C.52 D.26
Nadya [2.5K]

   First of all in order for us to figure out what angle x is we need to find the formula for finding that specific type of angle.

Formula is...

x = (far arc - close arc) ÷ 2

Now we just need to plug in.

x = (172° - 52°) ÷ 2 =

x = 120° ÷ 2 = 60°

Your answer: x = 60°

Good Luck! :)

❤️ ❤️ ❤️

6 0
3 years ago
Austin mowed 8 lawns in 3 hours at that rate how long will it take him to mow 12 hours
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

the answer is 32 lawns in 12 hours!

Step-by-step explanation:

3 hours = 8 lawns

6 hours = 16 lawns

9 hours = 24 lawns

12 hours = 32 lawns

Hope thus helped

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need help with question
Vlad [161]
Your answer is gonna be the second one!
5 0
3 years ago
In the largest clinical trial ever​ conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group consis
BARSIC [14]

Answer:

The requirements for the hypothesis test does satisfied the method for testing the claim that from two population proportions the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine.

Step-by-step explanation:

The percentage of children in the treatment group was:

(201229/401974)*100 = 49.9%

The percentage of children given placebo was:

(200745/401974)*100 = 50.1%

The percentage of children that developed polio in the treatment group:

(33/200745)*100 = 0.0164%

The percentage of children that developed polio in the placebo group:

(115/201229)*100 = 0.0571%

The percentage difference between the two group:

((0.0571-0.0164)/0.0571) = 61.62%

Therefore:

The amount of children used for each group was almost divided into half of the total amount of children. The test revealed although very small percentages of the both group developed polio, 68.62% more children given placebo than the children that was given the salk vaccine. Therefore, the study shows that the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine and the the hypthesis test is satisfied.

6 0
3 years ago
Confession under the radical in the quadratic formula that indicates the nature of the solutions real or complex rational or irr
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

discriminant

Step-by-step explanation:

Discriminant is the expression under the radical in a quadratic equation formula that indicates the nature of the solutions real or complex, rational or irrational , single or double root in other words

A discriminant can be said to be used to indicate the nature of the result that a quadratic equation when solved will yield and this can be : rational or irrational , complex or real, single or double roots. and it also indicates by how many  it would be  

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 100 POINTS!!! PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Universal Forest's current stock price is $154.00 and it is likely to pay a $5.23 dividend next year. Since analysts estimate Un
    12·1 answer
  • What's the square root of 34 rounded to the nearest tenth?
    13·2 answers
  • Jim invested $10,000 at 2% interest compounded annually over 2 years if the total amount in the account after 2 years is $10,404
    9·1 answer
  • A. 66 ft.3<br><br> B.80 ft.3<br><br> C.128 ft.3<br><br> D.256 ft.3<br> Please answer thank you!:)
    8·1 answer
  • Determine if the relation is a function and explain.<br> a. {(-5,2), (-2,5), (0,7), (0,9)}
    13·1 answer
  • HEEELLLLPP!!!!!!!!!! Please help i hate algebra this is so confusing!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Write the expression as a square of a binomial: 9/25a^6b^2-a^4b^4+25/36a^2b^6
    15·1 answer
  • Match each inequality to the correct graph.
    6·1 answer
  • A circle has a radius of 11 in. Find the length s of the arc intercepted by a central angle of 11°.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!