answer
The President of the USA is not required to have ever held any office
or been elected to anything. A candidate's level of education or training
for anything is irrelevant, and it would be totally un-American to impose
any sort of religious test.
In fact, a candidate for president is not required to have any skills, talent,
ability, experience, or qualifications of any kind.
The only constitutional requirement is that the candidate will need to turn
35 years old by the time s/he takes office.
If this is for a class, this might not be the answer you’re looking for.
America has always been against immigration. Even as it was being built on the backs of immigrants from Europe, the colonists who were already here despised them. Xenophobia has been a part of American culture since it was founded. This long history with anti-immigration and nationalism coupled with white supremacy makes many Americans wary toward immigrants today.
The difference is quite simple, a child under the care of his parents is not a slave, or at least he is not supposed to be. A slave is a human being forced into involuntary and total servitude for the entirety of his life. A child is only under the authority of his parents until he turns 18. As of 18 years of age he/she is considered an adult and can do as he/she pleases with his own life. It needs to be remarked that authority is not the same as forced involuntary servitude (though some kids might be inclined to use such term when asked to collaborate with reasonable house chores but that is just plain hyperbolic immaturity). The emancipation of an actual slave by a slave owner is seldom voluntary and most times it is forced (it took a Civil War to settle the question). The emancipation of a kid takes place for very different reasons:
- The parents are found to neglect the well-being of the child (exploitation, sexual abuse, violent physical or psychological abuse, etc). The child is then emancipated, that is to say removed from his parent’s care and either becomes a ward of the State or the adopted son or daughter of another family).
- The child has left school at age 16 and starts working and earning his/her own salary and achieves financial independence from his /her parents. He/she marries or enters the army.
It is evident that the only similarity between the emancipation of a child and the emancipation of a slave is the use of the same word that has the same etymological source but very different meanings.
Between the times of actual slavery and now. Things have changed quite a bit. There was no legal framework for the emancipation of children, let alone laws preventing their neglect by parents. Emancipation of slaves occurred a long time before the emancipation of children was established in the 20th century. It did take place de facto before that but there was no legal framework.
Answer:
Forced them to leave for Siberia
The land was taken away from farmers.
Suppress of Ukrainian intellectuals because of nationalism.
Explanation:
The Ukrainian people forced into the genocide as Stalin introduced new reforms in the economy by imposing collectivism. Collectivism replaces small farmers with state-run collectives. Many of the Ukrainians were starved as famine hit the country in 1932-33. 13 per cent of the population in the country died as they were starved to death.
Statistics are supposed to make something easier to understand but when used in a misleading fashion can trick the casual observer into believing something other than what the data shows. That is, a misuse of statistics occurs when a statistical argument asserts a falsehood. In some cases, the misuse may be accidental. In others, it is purposeful and for the gain of the perpetrator. When the statistical reason involved is false or misapplied, this constitutes a <span>statistical fallacy</span>.
The false statistics trap can be quite damaging to the quest for knowledge. For example, in medical science, correcting a falsehood may take decades and cost lives.
Misuses can be easy to fall into. Professional scientists, even mathematicians and professional statisticians, can be fooled by even some simple methods, even if they are careful to check everything. Scientists have been known to fool themselves with statistics due to lack of knowledge of probability theory and lack of standardization of their tests.
