Answer:
1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers
3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.
4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.
5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.
Part Two
1. Unnecessary and dangerous
2. From the Federalist No.84
3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.
4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.
5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.
The correct answer is option <u><em>B) religious differences.</em></u><u><em>
</em></u>
Although there were religious differences between the intervening countries, there were both in opposing and allied countries, and the religious aspect did not play an important role as cause of the war.
The powers of the time competed for the control of the colonies of Africa, Asia and America mainly with the desire to get raw materials in the height of the Industrial Revolution.
In order to obtain more and more colonies, deploy overseas trade, and defend themselves against other powers, some European nations had developed an army and very powerful armies.
Nationalisms were booming at that time and many mutual protection agreements had been established between different countries in the face of foreign attacks on one of them.
There were ethnic groups in the Austro-Hungarian Empire that considered themselves as nations, such as the Italians, the Serbs and the Magyars.
The beginning of the war was born from a specific event that unleashed declarations of war between countries that forced to enter their successive military allies.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren delivered the unanimous ruling in the landmark civil rights case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. State-sanctioned segregation of public schools was a violation of the 14th Amendment and was therefore unconstitutional.
Good history research can be found on history archives. It’s a government website so it would be approved by teachers. I learned a lot from there and just studying :). Hope this helps.
The constitutional right to bear arms for example as of recent has been getting the attention of many asking to put restrictions on guns which is against the constitution as no rights shall be infringed Also many people are being silenced for using their constitutional right of free speech even some getting arrested for exercising this right
There are a few ways:
<span>1) The most common is on appeal from state courts. A case originating in state court must work its way through the state court system up to the state's court of last resort (i.e. state supreme court), and then it can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but only if there is a substantial question involving a question of U.S. constitutionality. </span>
<span>2) On appeal through the Federal court system. A common route for a case involving Federal laws and the U.S. Constitution is for it to be first tried in the U.S. District Courts, and then appealed to the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals. The party losing at the Circuit Court may then appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. </span>
<span>In each of these two situations, the Supreme Court has the option to deny a hearing for the appeal. </span>
<span>3) There are a limited scope of cases that can go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court without having to go through the lower court systems. This is not common at all, but is provided for in Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution</span>
