Answer:
noo srry plz dont h8 on me if u do
Explanation:
1.- These 3 arrangements differ from each other, since the Amalgamation, is the mixture of different things, they may be cultures or races, the Assimilation is the process of adaptation of the immigrant to the receiving society. This acquires the culture and customs of the adoption community, disappearing their status as "different". To the extent that the immigrant adopts the culture of receiving society, this will admit you as one more member, producing its full integration. This theory has been strongly criticized, from the ethical point of view, but also by believing that the immigrant will adapt to the new culture, independently of its origin, race or religion. And Pluralism refers to the dominant trend is that neither natives nor immigrants want to lose their identity, and adaptation would occur through the adherence of all, to common principles of coexistence , being able to maintain at certain levels the cultural characteristics of each group and as long as the conflicts that may arise do not affect these basic principles of coexistence, which are those that confer a sense of community and avoid social fragmentation. The most common stereotypes are: Americans, Latins, African Americans, Chinese, they will be more or less frequent depending on the city where you live, Latins are a common stereotype in the northern United States, and I do not think they are harmful to any group, The harmfulness of something or someone does not come from their race, or stereotyping.2.- In my country we experience the 3 arrangements, amalgamation, assimilation and pluralism, nowadays, thanks to globalization, we experience all 3 in many countries of the world, in almost all countries there is a mixture of races and customs derived from foreign citizens, in many of them foreigners adapt so much to the culture that they are inserted very quickly assimilating it as their own, and in many others the different cultures struggle to maintain their origin and customs, giving way to pluralization.
What was America's Response to the Holocaust before the War?
Americans paid attention and were outraged by the Nazi attacks through petitions where tens of thousands of Americans wrote, signed, and sent the documents to Washington. It tells that the American people had information on the persecution of the Jews in 1933. The Americans saw the early warning sign through Adolf Hitler, an authoritarian ruler who had spread an exclusionary and violent racist ideology that became the precursors to genocide. To protest, Americans showed up at rallies and boycotted German stores.
What could the US Have done differently?
Adolf Hitler paid close attention to the American media coverage and may have gone further, and faster, had he not read about the American people's disapproval. Fewer Jews may have gotten out of Germany, and America could have been less prepared to respond militarily. The rallies, petitions, and boycotts mattered a great deal with a network formed by like-minded Americans who in this period that later led some Americans to raise their voices even louder and take greater risks as Nazi persecutions of Jews worsened in Europe. There were warning signs on Hitler and Nazi Germany, weekly and the US would have acted. These signs included the targeting of Jews, communists, and other political opponents.
Answer:
Bullying
Explanation:
When you boo,y it hurts there’s bullying is a big thing going on right now so if I were you I would choose bullying I haven’t been bullied but i bullied someone else before after it dint feel nice there’s this say that says dont do to others if you don’t want there’s to do to you so bullying just search it and there you have it a straight A+ okay ✍️✍️✍️✍️️️️️️️
Answer: non-value added work: this are Job activities that do not add value to products and services but are necessary for the job. e.g An outdated method of doing a job.
Value added work: this are job activities, product or services a customer is willing to pay for. E.g a job done right at the first instance.
Explanation: 1. Non-value added work.
(f) officers waiting for a passenger to arrive.
(c) officers moving bins back to the beginning of the X-ray machines.
(e) officers putting bags in the X-ray machine for a second time in case they previously contained fluids.
Officer having to move bins back to the beginning of the the x-ray machine is obsolete and outdated because escalators can now do that, but it is necessary they do it. Having to put the bags back in the x-ray doesn't add value but is necessary for the job. Which is same as officers waiting for passengers arrival
2. Value added work.
(a) officers checking IDs.
(b) officers telling passengers to take off their shoes.
(d) officers looking at the screen of the X-ray machine.
What makes this jobs similar is that the activities are performed once, which adds value to work.
