Under the U.S. Constitution, the president is elected, and the Congress is elected.
- The Constitution of the U.S. is the document that shows the framework for the government.
- It also contains principles of government, including information about various political positions such as the President and Congress.
- The U.S. Constitution involve choosing the president and members of Congress through the vote.
- The President is elected through an electoral vote every four years. Similarly, Congress, composed of the House of Representatives and the Senate members, are elected through direct popular vote.
- The process of applying electors comes from the Constitution.
Therefore, we can conclude that the president is not elected by voters, instead, chosen by electors through the Electoral College.
Thus the correct answer is the president is elected, and Congress is elected.
Learn more about "the president and members of Congress" here:
brainly.com/question/11986368
Answer:
B, Mendel found evidence that there are two factors for each trait.
Explanation:
Gregor Mendel was an Augustinian Catholic monk and naturalist. He formulated, through the work he carried out with different varieties of pea or pea (Pisum sativum), the so-called laws of Mendel that gave rise to genetic inheritance. The first works in genetics were made by Mendel. Initially made crossings of seeds, which were particularized by leaving different styles and some of its same form. In its results, it found characters, which, depending on whether the allele is dominant or recessive, can be expressed in different ways. The dominant alleles are characterized by determining the effect of a gene and recessive because they have no genetic effect (say, expression) on a heterozygous phenotype.
Answer:
- an extensive loss of German soldiers
- exhausted German supplies
- the end of the German advance
Explanation:
hope this helps

ARTS&CULTURE
How Arab nationalism was born as the Ottoman empire died
In its dying days, the Ottoman Empire attempted to use religion to prolong its life but nascent Arab nationalism helped speed up the inevitable – with consequences we are living with still.
The Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II in Constantinople during the celebrations for his accession to the throne in September 1876, in an engraving by Antonio Bonamore. DeAgostini / Getty Images

John Mchugo
December 4, 2014
Facing an uncertain future, the religious and ethnic minority groups across Iraq and Syria today have also served as a reminder of the region’s great diversity. The end of a year marking the centenary of the start of the First World War seems a propitious time to assess the relationship between nationalism, ethnic identity and religious affiliation that played out in Greater Syria and the toxic mix of colonial self-interest, authoritarianism and religion that still exacts its price today.
When the Ottoman Navy launched an attack on Russian naval bases in the Black Sea early in the First World War, the once mighty Ottoman Empire had been in decline for more than two centuries. The great powers of Europe had rolled back its frontiers and encircled it with their colonial possessions, but its main losses had been to the nationalism that spread among its subject peoples as the 19th century wore on
