Answer:
B). "He found that children and adults who have read stories their whole lives were more likely to correctly identify the feelings and thoughts of others than those who do not read regularly."
C). "Trying to understand these characters exercises the same mental muscle that helps us understand people in the real world."
Explanation:
The above two evidence factually support and substantiate the claim that 'people who read stories are better at communicating and understanding the feelings of others.'
The first evidence i.e. option B states that <u>the research revealed 'the children or adults who have been reading stories constantly their whole lives are able to recognize the thoughts or feelings of others more accurately' while the second evidence i.e. option C asserts logically that 'in attempt to understand the characters of stories, the same mental muscle is required for understanding people in real life.'</u>
Thus, these two pieces of evidence not only support but substantiates how reading comprehends our understanding of thoughts, opinions, or feelings of others. Hence, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
That which is NOT an example of irony in "The Censors" is:
C) Juan's mother attempts to get him to go out with friends
<h3>What is an irony?</h3>
Irony refers to the use of mockery to state truths. Sometimes, it could also mean the opposite of an expected end.
In The Censors, the attempt made by Juan's mother to get him to go out with his friend cannot be regarded as irony because it represents plain circumstances with no hidden meaning.
It was however ironic for Juan to write a letter to Mariana and still censor it. This is because it is the opposite of an expected end.
Learn more about irony here:
brainly.com/question/26138104
#SPJ1
