1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
statuscvo [17]
4 years ago
9

Individual rights must be balanced against the values of society at large. For instance, the right to free speech must be balanc

ed against our desire for an orderly society. This is why demonstrations, while protected by the First Amendment, can have certain restrictions placed on them. In Miranda v. Arizona, what values or goals of society must be balanced against the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel? Why? Answer
Law
1 answer:
azamat4 years ago
8 0

<u>Explanation:</u>

Using the Miranda v. Arizona case as an example, we need to remember that M.r Mirinda was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping; which are part of the important issues society tries to avoid

In other words, he went against these important values and goals of society. Hence, there must be a balance between the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel over breaking other laws in the constitution.

You might be interested in
Critical thinking is useless today with the internet?
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

not true, If the internet shut down we think how to fix it...

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chapter 1 covers various Schools of Legal Thought. 1) Pick two of the schools of thought and describe how each school of thought
Nat2105 [25]

Answer and Explanation:

Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.

Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.

2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.

7 0
3 years ago
All of the following situations may result in a strict liability tort EXCEPT: Select one: a. A car driven by someone speeding ex
Inessa [10]

Answer: A. a car driven by someone speeding excessively causes an accident.

Explanation:

Strict liability is simply referred to as a liability that is without fault. According to strict liability, someone can be liable to commit a crime even though such person didn't intentionally cause the harm or wasn't in his or her good state of mind.

From the information given in the question, the situations that may result in a strict liability include a neighbor's pet tiger that escapes and mauls a child, a truck carrying nuclear waste that crashes when the driver falls asleep and a faulty car that causes an accident.

6 0
3 years ago
LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin. While visiting Six Flags Over Georgia in Atlanta, she was criminally assaulted by Hans, a M
diamong [38]

As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be <u>Georgia</u>.

<h3>Why would the venue be Georgia?</h3>

The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.

Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.

Find out more on original venues at brainly.com/question/342388.

8 0
3 years ago
Why can a lawyer admit some kinds of public records into evidence without a witness to testify that the document is genuine?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
The second option is the correct answer.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The location where a crime took place is called the __________ crime scene, while the ________ crime scene is where evidence of
    14·2 answers
  • _____ signs tell you what roads, cities, and services are nearby.
    14·2 answers
  • What is a constitution in government?
    8·1 answer
  • A retired marine is caught robbing a bank. Is this
    7·1 answer
  • Rodney is a crime scene investigator. He has completed a thorough search of the crime scene and collected and recorded the evide
    9·1 answer
  • What do some police officers have to do to get in the academy?
    8·2 answers
  • Why does robbery consist of the crimes theft and assault?
    10·1 answer
  • Which form of damages involves a court ordering a party to a contract to perform his/her obligations under the contract
    12·1 answer
  • Ahmed is 16 years old and has left home to pursue a job. His parents do not agree with his decision and will not support him. He
    15·1 answer
  • NEED THIS ASAP!! PLEASE HELP!! WILL GIVE 10 PTS!! WILL MARK BRAINLIST!!
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!