1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
statuscvo [17]
3 years ago
9

Individual rights must be balanced against the values of society at large. For instance, the right to free speech must be balanc

ed against our desire for an orderly society. This is why demonstrations, while protected by the First Amendment, can have certain restrictions placed on them. In Miranda v. Arizona, what values or goals of society must be balanced against the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel? Why? Answer
Law
1 answer:
azamat3 years ago
8 0

<u>Explanation:</u>

Using the Miranda v. Arizona case as an example, we need to remember that M.r Mirinda was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping; which are part of the important issues society tries to avoid

In other words, he went against these important values and goals of society. Hence, there must be a balance between the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel over breaking other laws in the constitution.

You might be interested in
This court has appellate jurisdiction and limited original jurisdiction; this court is the final court of appeals.
aksik [14]

Answer:

The Supreme Court of the United States.

Explanation:

Pursuant to the US Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction implies that the Supreme Court is the first and only court entitled to hear a case. However, the Constitution limits this power and the court deals with cases involving disputes between states or controversies among ambassadors or other ministers. Appellate jurisdiction refers to the fact that the court has the authority to review judgments passed by lower courts. Frequently, the Supreme Court hears the cases that have already been decided by any US Court of Appeals.

If a person is not satisfied with a decision/ruling made by a district court, he/she may appeal such decision. The case is then reviewed by a Court of Appeals. After the appellate court has pronounced judgment, the ruling may be reviewed by the Supreme Court.  

4 0
3 years ago
Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer dr
loris [4]

Answer:

Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer drug. The defense requested a copy of the trade secret documents. The government contended that the defense did not need access to the documents except under supervision of the judge. The defense maintained a right of full access to the documents so the defense of impossibil- ity could be established, meaning Hsu could not steal trade secrets that did not exist. District court agreed with the defense; government appealed. Must the defendant be allowed full access to trade secrets that are a key part of a case? [U.S. v. Hsu, 155 F. 3d 189, 3rd Cir. (1998)]

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
If a I ordered someone to buy for me a sock absorber for of road driving and bought the one that get spoiled after the first roa
Radda [10]

The legal advice that would be given here would depend on whether or not the person who accepted to purchase the shock absorber acted as an agent or broker.

<h3>Who is an agent or broker?</h3>

A broker is described as a person or organization that negotiates contracts and serves as a middleman between a buyer and a seller in exchange for a fee.

A broker is a non-party to a transaction and is distinct from an agent, who represents the primary party in a transaction.

It is important to note that the element that changes the equation is whether or not the "someone" carried out the above transaction for a fee to them.

If they did, the they may be liable to ensure that you got proper value for money. If not, then they are not liable, they were simply acting on your instruction.

Another line of recourse would be to check the warranties and guaranties given on the product that was purchased.

Learn more about agency:
brainly.com/question/23534924
#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
How do you think land use in the U.S. will change in the future?
zlopas [31]

Explanation:

The increasing population and urbanization have resulted into changes in the land use pattern. Large scale forests have been destructed to expand land for cultivation.

7 0
3 years ago
Sara does not often ask questions about her father's past. He emigrated to the United States and tells her that the man he was b
Katarina [22]

Answer:

C. Japanese Yakusa

Explanation:

Yakuza adopt samurai-like rituals and often bear elaborate body tattoos.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE ANSWER
    5·1 answer
  • Manny is driving down Polo Bl. And is stopped by the local police for speeding 45 in a 35 mph. Zone. He is written a traffic sum
    7·1 answer
  • During your morning shift, you observe a motorist traveling 40 mph in a 15 mph school zone. You stop the vehicle, and the motori
    13·1 answer
  • English
    8·1 answer
  • Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which correct- ed us and we gave them "rever ence: shall we not much rather be in s
    13·1 answer
  • What policy/policies impact your life?
    10·1 answer
  • What type of gov do these terms describe?
    9·1 answer
  • A tire manufacturer has recently discovered that numerous lots of tires
    9·1 answer
  • Criminal acts range from relatively minor crimes, such as trespassing or shoplifting, to severe crimes, such as arson or murder.
    10·1 answer
  • Anyone become my big sister please <br><br><br>myself Aditya Sharma age 16 standard 11 arts​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!