Answer:
Two actions which took place.
1) was it a defamation for the publisher - yes,
2) false light? no
Explanation:
It was a defamation of character from the publisher because what he did could cause harm to the young child, One thing is show though the accusation of a false light is a no. And lana can't complain about how her pictrue was made because she was in a public space so no reasonable expectation of privacy.
Answer:
No?
Explanation:
But that's the truth, i did not know about this as Brainly didn't say about this themselves. That didn't come in mind to me as I know in general thought, anyone could track you no matter what app or website you use.
Answer:
option c
One-half
constitutional amendment require ratification by one half of the state legislatures.
