People often have their opinions been challenged several times. A time when I were challenged by a perspective that differed from your own was when i was in the university.
- A lecturer of mine taught us a topic and there was a statement he made that was quite different from what I was taught at home. This is because the topic he was teaching was familiar to me. I decided to raise tell Him my own perspective of what he said during the question and answer time, but he was still adamant that his own deductions were right.
- At first, I was not not happy by his response or perspective. But I have to look at it from another angle. Not Everyone may agree with you or your perspective but that does not mean you or them are wrong.
A change in perspective can result in a big a positive but it also has its own challenges when responding to one's views. Through the act of engaging in different opinions and different ideas, and shifting one's perspective along with others, one can learn.
Learn more about Perspectives from
brainly.com/question/13107415
Yes, because wealth means that the nation has a lot of funding, enough to where the schools in the country are excellent
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
The Principle of Cross-Cutting tells us that a fault must be older than the rock it cuts. Cross-cutting in geology was formulated by Nicolas Steno, a Danish geologist in the mid-1600's. It is usually used in combination with radiometric age dating, which can tell the geologist how old the rock is.
False..The first direct entry into the field of transportation,beginning in 1881 was the construction of the national road from Maryland to Illinois.
