The number of births in a population in a certain amount of time is the birth rate
Answer:
Bribery in the world of business typically happens when an organization or representative of an organization gives financial benefits to an official to gain favor or manipulate a business decision - True.
Bribery is the giving or offering of items of value (especially money) to a government official in exchange for favorable treatment. Bribing is unethical and illegal, but it is common practice in many countries, so common that it is expected.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was implemented in the aftermath of disclosures that businesses were violating the IMA Code of Ethics - True.
In the seventies, U.S. Government investigations found that hundreds of U.S. companies operating abroad had turned to bribery in order to gain the favor of foreing officials. This conduct is related to the statement explained above: bribery is pervasive in many countries around the world.
Managers are required to follow specific rules issued by the IMA for internal financial reporting. - False.
The IMA Code of Ethics does not provide specific rules for financial reporting (these specific rules are found instead either in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or in the or in the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)).
The IMA Code of Ethics instead provides principles, or ethical guidelines, to be followed by participants in the management accounting profession.
Ethics is more than obeying laws - True.
Ethics goes beyond what is legally right, and is more related to what is morally right. An ethical person should do the right thing even if there is no legal code explicitely telling him to do so.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act addressed public company accounting reform. - True
This act added requirements for public accounting firms, and included legal penalties including possible jail time for certain types of misconduct. The Act was enacted following major accounting scandals such as Enron.
Answer:
Non equity Strategic Alliance
Explanation:
It would have been an equity strategic alliance if one company had bought shares in the other company, but that is not the case in the scenario
A Non Strategic Alliance is one where both companies agree contractually to combine their capabilities and/or resources together for the purpose of achieving a common goal, which describes the situation in the scenario.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
As maximization of the earnings per share might not be the same thing as the wealth maximization which is the primary goal of the company because the company not only has to generate higher profits but also manage all the risks of the entity which might increase by unethical trading in race to increase earnings per share. Furthermore, to enjoy less costly debt finance which would increase the earnings per share, would result in increase in financial risk, which might again head the company towards disaster if not well managed.
The other solid point against the statement would be that the primary purpose can not be the maximization of earnings per share as it stresses upon spending less on corporate social responsibility and as the result the company stock will be less valued at stock exchange. The less valued stock is because the companies like Dow and S & P Global adds no green value to the stock if the company is not spending on social responsibility programs.
Hence the statement is incorrect.
