Answer:
It's the first one because he can send troops to action because He/she is the commander in chief, but it must get approved by congress before he/she does.
Explanation:
Answer:
d
Explanation:
im pretty sure thats the answer. i dont have much experence in law but thats what i keep getting :)
The argument that might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws is that Corporations and labor unions that have too much power.
Financial law is defined as the law and standard or regulation of the derivatives, insurance, commercial banking, investment management sectors, and capital markets.
The people that support the strict campaign finance laws are the companies or corporations and the labor unions because they have a too much power in the finance laws.
learn more about the finance laws here
brainly.com/question/515053
#SPJ4
It’s likely that evidence will be destroyed by the subject is the correct answer
What’s your question exactly do u have an image to show
