Haha I’m currently working on this right now but this is what I have so far hopefully this helps a lil :)
1. I agree with the statement “sports, just like everything else is political” because throughout these past few years it has been nothing but that. For instance, take the 2021 presidency for example. There were many polls stationed around many stadiums through out the United States as well as voting ads appearing on sports channels.
2. A “paradoxical yet symbiotic relationship” was that NFL and Major League Baseball are trying not to be political but most people think that what they are doing is just that, political.
3. He believes it’s Trump
5. My view on it is that it’s a good way for players to speak up and bring awareness to the political matters at hand.
Answer:
Nasa pic yung sagot
Explanation:
<em>P</em><em>a </em><em>brainlest </em><em>please </em>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the text or the excerpt for reference.
There are also no options attached.
What response? From who? What is the reference?
However, trying to help, we can comment on the following general terms.
What does his response tell you about the Framers' intentions regarding the institutional design of the judiciary?
You are probably referring to Federalists Alexander Hamilton's opinion about the judiciary.
If that is the case, then we can say that Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalists Paper n.- 78, under a pseudonym, and he referred to the importance of the judiciary. He considered that the judiciary was an important institution to help and protect the people from bad or abusive legislation.
Hamilton also thought that the judiciary was important to enforce the legislation included in the US Constitution. Hamilton thought that the judiciary had the obligation to interpret the legislation to correctly apply it, and also should be the institution to keep an eye on Congress in order to limit it to exceed its powers.
