Answer:
(1)The use of evidence-based treatment that is deemed appropriate for your particular issue.
(2) Important factor is the clinical expertise of the psychologist or therapist.
(3)Ones own characteristics, values, preferences, and culture.
Explanation:
Many people begin psychotherapy feeling like their problem will never be resolved; however, psychotherapy helps people see that they can do things to make their situation better.
Answer:
As one's peesonality ages so do their experiences also do so. Imagine if you were a child and were extremely happy. Then imagine years later when you are no longer happy. What caused that... it was an experience.
Answer:
Similarities:
Disease wipes out native populations
Trading with Europeans
Assimilation
Differences:
Encomienda System (Spanish & Southern Indigenous People)
French Fur Trades & Alliances with Native Populations in what is now Canada.
Explanation:
Answer: D. Systematic
Explanation: Harmon clothing is likely experiencing a systematic political risk. A systematic political risk can be explained as the political events, decision or regulations which can negatively affect the growth or survival of a business or investment in a particular country. Systematic political risks may affect all segments of a country's market or it might be targeted towards a particular sector or market segment. Systematic political risk may stem from wholesale change in policies and regulation of the host government due to change of power or shift in major economic decisions or protocol.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
