The strategic decision was to try and get on there good side so that no more of there land got taken and also ways so that they knew what was going on and to get inside information. Your welcome. :) Brainliest please?
Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
<span>Franklin Pierce was the 14th president of the United States.</span>
His policy of 'perestroyka' led to more openness and ultimately the collapse of the USSR. He was the first soviet leader not personally trained by Stalin.He had to deal with the consequences of the worst nuclear disaster ever (Chernobyl),which could not simply be covered over politically or by secrecy.He admitted the soviet economy had supply and demand problems that needed significant repair.He admitted soviet industry had extreme inefficiency.He requested more honest and open press coverage.he increased the price of a loaf of bread.
Florida was the state that was the center of an election controversy in the 2000 election that culminated in the Bush versus Gore Supreme Court case. Hope it helped, God bless.
