I feel that Hamilton's statements has some threshold, in reflection, to today's modern society. I believe that with the many diverse opinions, it seems as if it has weakened us a little more. Lets take for example, the TPP agreement, this stirred many controversy between the rich and the middle classed folks. It was like clashing between Left and Right wing...But that depends on your stance. Another example would be Trump's idea of building a wall. That idea may still be a thought, but the idea of actually building a wall to divide America and Mexico, stirred a lot of hate, and yet a lot of support from the general public. And there were even some who were in between. But regardless, the statement really depends on how clean (or non-biased) your eye lenses are.
I hope you understood that. Have any doubts, please say so. Chur! :)<span />
Answer:
Just took the test it was "Political oppertunities for African Americans disappeared after a short time"
Explanation:
They crossed over a "land bridge" between the countries. The ice froze all the water so they were able to walk across it.
The Senate bestreflected the goals of the supporters of the New Jersey Plan.
Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The New Jersey Program was one way of governing the United States. Instead of the nation, the plan called for one vote by each government in Congress. On 15 June 1787 William Paterson, a New Jersey representative, presented it to the Constitutional amendment.
Perhaps most notably the Connecticut Negotiation was adopted, which created a bicameral congressional concept with the United States.
The Senate divided by population in accordance with the plan of Virginia and the Senate, in compliance with the plan of New Jersey, awarded equal votes by province.
When the agreements were made, William Paterson and other delegates from smaller countries poured themselves in front of the new Constitution. Although the New Jersey Policy of Paterson was vetoed, the debates over his plan guaranteed the US. With every country having two representatives, the Senate would be organized.
